Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2512 UK
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 414 of 2025 (S/S)
Kamlapati Sanwal and others ..........Petitioners
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the
State/respondent nos.1 and 2.
Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 7.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this petition is made to certain
orders, by which, the Grade Pay of the petitioners have
been reduced and certain orders were passed. The
petitioners also claim that their amount of gratuity and
encashment may be re-calculated based on the
admissible Grade Pay.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would
submit that the matter is squarely covered by the
judgment dated 12.02.2025, passed by this Court in
WPSS No.446 of 2020, Lalit Chandra Tiwari and others
vs. State of Uttarakhand and others; and connected
cases.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents admit
these facts.
5. Since, the matter is covered, instant petition is
decided in terms of the judgment dated 12.02.2025,
passed by this Court in WPSS No.446 of 2020, Lalit
Chandra Tiwari and others vs. State of Uttarakhand and
others; and connected cases.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 26.03.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!