Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2276 UK
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2025
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 270 of 2025 (S/S)
Dinesh Kumar ..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand and others ........ Respondents
Present : Mr. D.S. Mehta and Ms. Nisha Bora, Advocates for the petitioner.
Mr. Pradeep Hairiya, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this writ petition is made to
the transfer order dated 15.02.2025 and relieving order
dated 20.02.2025.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
3. The petitioner is working in Police Department.
By the impugned order, he has been transferred from
District Nainital to District Chamoli. In fact, the petitioner
is involved in NDPS cases. Therefore, he has been
transferred.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would
submit that from District Chamoli it would be very
difficult for the petitioner to attend the court's
proceedings and defend himself; it may effect his right to
fair trial. It is also argued that the petitioner has served
14 years in the hill area.
5. The petitioner is working in police department.
Discipline in every service is paramount, but in police, it
is expected a little more. There is nothing to show that the
transfer is mala fide or there is some statutory Rules that
have been violated. Therefore, this Court does not see any
reason to interfere in the instant petition. Accordingly, the
petition deserves to be dismissed at the stage of
admission itself.
6. The petition is dismissed in limine.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 05.03.2025 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!