Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 887 UK
Judgement Date : 7 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PANKAJ PUROHIT
7TH MAY, 2024
WRIT PETITION (PIL) No. 5 OF 2021
Between:
Reenu Paul ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & others. ...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Abhijay Negi & Ms. Snigdha Tiwari,
learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 & 5 : Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief Standing
Counsel with Mr. S.S. Chaudhary,
learned Brief Holder for the State of
Uttarakhand.
Counsel for the respondent no. 2 : Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Standing
Counsel for the Union of India.
JUDGMENT :
(per Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
In this writ petition, allegedly filed in public
interest, petitioner has sought the following substantive
reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the decision as recommended by the State Wildlife Board to the Government of Uttarakhand on 24.11.2000, whose minutes were released on 24.12.2020 (Annexure 12) to denotify the Shiwalik Elephant Reserve.
2. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to proceed with the denotification of the Shiwalik Elephant Reserve.
3. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents to take steps to conserve the habitate of elephant that is increasingly facing fragmentation in the State of Uttarakhand.
4. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Prohibition to the Respondents from taking any decision on de- notification of the Shiwalik Elephant Reserve based on the recommendation dated 24.11.2020 (Annexure 12) of the Wildlife Board."
"
2. In sum and substance, petitioner is aggrieved by
the decision taken by Government of Uttarakhand, as notified
on 08.01.2021, whereby the notification dated 28.10.2002,
issued by the State Government, declaring certain areas of
State of Uttarakhand as Shivalik Elephant Reserve, was
cancelled. The said decision was taken by the State
Government to facilitate extension of Jollygrant Airport at
Dehradun. However, in the writ petition, the said notification
dated 08.01.2021 was not challenged, and what was
challenged was the notification issued by the State Wild Life
Board, pursuant to which the decision to cancel the
notification dated 28.10.2002 was taken.
3. Learned State Counsel has produced in Court a
subsequent notification dated 09.02.2023, issued by
Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of
Uttarakhand, which is taken on record. Perusal of the said
notification reveals that the notification dated 08.01.2021 has
now been cancelled and the Shivalik Elephant Reserve
declared by notification dated 28.10.2002 has been revived.
In view of this subsequent development, the reliefs as
claimed in the writ petition do not survive.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly concedes
that after issuance of notification dated 09.02.2023, the
prayers made in relief clause, except prayer no. 3, do not
survive.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
However, petitioner shall be at liberty to approach the
appropriate forum for conservation of habitat of elephants.
___________________ MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J.
______________ PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Dt: 07.05.2024 Navin
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!