Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 859 UK
Judgement Date : 3 May, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH THAPLIYAL
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 70 OF 2024
3RD MAY, 2024
Samadhan ...... Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...... Respondent
Counsel for the petitioner : Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned
counsel
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh,
learned Additional Advocate
General for the State
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Ms. Ritu Bahri)
Petitioner has not made any representation to
the State authority that they are not able to get the
information as there is no official website under Right to
Information Act, and this is causing grave problems to
the common men.
2) The writ petition is being disposed of by giving
liberty to the petitioner to make a detailed
representation to the authorities narrating its
grievances, and if the authorities do not take any action,
then the petitioner can approach this Court after a
period of one month.
3) The writ petition stands disposed of
accordingly.
_______________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
________________ RAKESH THAPLIYAL, J.
Dt: 3RD MAY, 2024 Negi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!