Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 383 UK
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI, C.J.
AND
MR. PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
18th MARCH, 2024
WRIT PETITION (CRL) NO. 233 OF 2024
Shadab .....Petitioner.
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others. .........Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Rajveer Singh.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court
made the following
JUDGMENT :
(per: Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
Petitioner has filed FIR No. 122 of 20203
(Annexure-1 to the writ petition) at Police Station
Pathri, Haridwar.
2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent
Nos. 4 and 5 and two unknown persons are threatening
the petitioner.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for
the State, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.
1 to 3.
5. This petition itself is taken as the representation of
the petitioner. The petitioner can approach the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 seeking protection and
respondent Nos. 1 to 3 can take appropriate steps as
per law after hearing the petitioner.
6. This petition stands disposed of accordingly.
_____________ RITU BAHRI, C.J.
__________________ PANKAJ PUROHIT, J.
Dt: 18th March, 2024 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!