Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pushkar Singh And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 368 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 368 UK
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

Pushkar Singh And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 18 March, 2024

Author: Pankaj Purohit

Bench: Pankaj Purohit

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

          Writ Petition (S/S) No.3130 of 2017
Pushkar Singh and Others                    ........Petitioners
                          Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others           ........Respondents
Presence:-
       Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the
       petitioners.
       Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C.
       along with Mr. Bhupendra Singh Koranga, learned
       Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/
       respondents.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of this writ petition, petitioners have sought the indulgence of this Court in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to absorb their services on the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) from the date the institute has been take on grant in aid and further commanding and directing the respondents to pay their salary from the date of taking the institution in grant in aid.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 participated in the selection process and were selected on the post of Assistant Teacher, (L.T. Grade), English and Physical Education respectively and the approval of the aforesaid selection was granted by the respondent No.3-Chief Education Officer, Nainital and accordingly, appointment letters were issued to the petitioner No.1 & 2 on 07.11.2015 and 09.11.2015

respectively. Similarly, an advertisement was published on 08.08.2003 in daily news paper Daily Jagran inviting applications for the post Assistant Teacher, (L.T. Grade), Hindi, in which, petitioner No.3 appeared and was selected by the Managing Committee and the appointment letter dated 30.08.2003 was issued. A Government Order was issued on 04.03.2014, taking 21 institutions under the grant-in-aid of the State Government including Hat Kalika Inter College Bindukhatta, Lalkuan District Nainital and consequently, one post of Principal and the post of Assistant Teacher (L.T. Grade) were also sanctioned. On 01.02.2016, another Government Order was issued, in which the State Government has decided to provide the grant for the financial year 2015-16 and for certain schools, it was provided that the grant shall be sanctioned after the sanction of the post and the token grant was provided. On 23.12.2016, another Government Order was issued granting token grant of Rs.2,00,000/- to Hat Kalika Inter College Bindukhatta, Lalkuan, District Nainital. The institution is already under full grant but the salary has not been released by the State Government.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the similar controversy has come up for consideration before this Court in writ petition No.1820 of 2017 (M/S) and this Court has been pleased to hold that in view of the Section 50 of the Uttarakhand Education Act 2006, the moment the

institute is taken into grant-in-aid list on the orders passed by Executive Head of the State Government, the State cannot back track on its commitments and its orders. The appeal filed against the orders passed in writ petition No.1820 of 2017 (M/S) has also been dismissed on merit on 06.08.2018 and since, no further appeal was filed, the judgment has attained the finality.

4. On the last date i.e.14.03.2024 learned State Counsel was directed to get instructions as to whether the matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court or not.

5. Today, learned State Counsel submits written instruction at Bar, the same is taken on record. According to the said written instruction, learned State Counsel submits that the matter is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1820 of 2017.

6. In such view of the matter, writ petition is allowed in terms of the judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in WPMS No.1820 of 2017.

7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.03.2024 PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter