Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPSB/32/2024
2024 Latest Caselaw 143 UK

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 143 UK
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2024

Uttarakhand High Court

WPSB/32/2024 on 23 February, 2024

Author: Pankaj Purohit

Bench: Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

                Office Notes,
             reports, orders or
SL.           proceedings or
      Date                                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No             directions and
             Registrar's order
              with Signatures
                                  WPSB No. 32 of 2024
                                  Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. Lochan Shah, Advocate for the petitioners.

2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, Addl. C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Petitioners served in different Government Polytechnics of State of Uttar Pradesh before State reorganization and thereafter, they served in Government Polytechnics of State of Uttarakhand. According to them, learned Single Judge of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court directed for creation of four-tier cadre structure in respect of staff serving in Government Polytechnics vide final order dated 11.04.2001 passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13727 of 1991, which was affirmed by Division Bench in Special Appeal No. 63 of 2003, therefore, similar order deserves to be passed in their favour.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of this Court to Annexure-3 to the Writ Petition, which is an order dated 01.02.2017 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6271 of 2012, whereby, the appeal filed by State of U.P. was disposed of.

5. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that as petitioners are similarly placed as the employees serving in Government Polytechnics of State of Uttar Pradesh, who have been given certain benefits in terms of the direction issued by learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 13727 of 1991, therefore, petitioners are also entitled to similar benefits. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pay-scale of teachers of Government Polytechnic in State of U.P. was also upgraded in terms of the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court.

6. Learned State Counsel, however, disputes this contention and he submits that there is no pleading to the effect that the salary and other service conditions of Teachers serving in Government Polytechnics of the State of U.P. were upgraded pursuant to the direction issued by Hon'ble Allahabad High Court. He has drawn attention of this Court to the order dated 01.02.2017 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6271 of 2012, whereby, liberty was granted to AICTE to take decision on the proposal submitted by State of U.P., pursuant to the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court.

7. Without going into the merits of the case, we dispose of the writ petition, with liberty to petitioners to submit joint representation to the Secretary, Technical Education within two weeks. If petitioners submit such representation within stipulated time, Secretary, Technical Education shall look into the matter and take decision, as per law within four months from the date of receipt of representation with certified copy of this order.

(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.02.2024 Ujjwal

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter