Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 788 UK
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2024
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI RAKESH THAPLIYAL
29th April, 2024
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.50 of 2023
M/s Uttarakhand Transport Corporation .....Revisionist
Versus
The Commissioner-Taxes, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
........Respondent
With
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.51 of 2023
M/s Uttarakhand Transport Corporation .....Revisionist
Versus
The Commissioner-Taxes, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
........Respondent
With
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.52 of 2023
M/s Uttarakhand Transport Corporation .....Revisionist
Versus
The Commissioner-Taxes, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
........Respondent
With
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.53 of 2023
M/s Uttarakhand Transport Corporation ....Revisionist
Versus
The Commissioner-Taxes, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
........Respondent
With
COMMERCIAL TAX REVISION No.54 of 2023
M/s Uttarakhand Transport Corporation .....Revisionist
Versus
2
The Commissioner-Taxes, Uttarakhand, Dehradun
........Respondent
Counsel for the revisionist : Mr. Shobhit Joshi, learned counsel
holding brief of Mr. Ashish Joshi,
learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondent Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief
Holder.
Judgment: (per Ms. Ritu Bahri, C.J.)
For the reasons stated in the delay
condonation applications (IA No.01 of 2023), the delay is
condoned, and the application seeking condonation of
delay stands allowed.
2. Learned counsel for the revisionists has
referred to an order passed by this Court on 09.12.2014,
in TTR No.01 of 2014, "Uttarakhand Transport
Corporation Vs. Commissioner, Commercial Tax,
Uttarakhand", whereby the Uttarakhand Transport
Corporation had come up in the revision against the
order imposing 50% of the penalty, on non deposit of
the Value Added Tax. This Court had reduced the penalty
to 20%.
3. Learned counsel for the revisionists submits
that he is claiming the similar benefit in these revisions,
where also the Corporation has been saddled with 50%
of penalty.
4. Keeping in view that the penalty has been
reduced to 20% in other case, even these revisions are
3
allowed. The impugned order dated 16.11.2018,
Annexure no.1, is being modified that penalty imposed
of 50% is reduced to 20%, and if any extra amount has
been paid, it shall be returned back to the
appellant/Corporation.
___________________________
Ritu Bahri, CJ.
___________________________
Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
Dt: 29th April, 2024 NR/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!