Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 517 UK
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
and Registrar's
order with
Signatures
25.02.2023 WPMS No. 2923 of 2019
WPMS No. 2953 of 2019
WPMS No. 2974 of 2019
WPMS No. 3137 of 2019
Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.
Sri Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, the learned counsel for the petitioners in WPMS No. 2923 of 2019.
Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, the learned counsel for the petitioner in WPMS No. 2953 of 2019.
Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, the learned counsel for the petitioner in WPMS No. 3137 of 2019.
Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, the learned counsel for the State Election Commission.
These Writ Petitions were preferred to challenge Section 8(1)(r), Section 53(1)(r) and Section 90(1)(r) of the Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj (Amendment) Act, 2019. The issue raised in these Writ Petitions is squarely covered by the judgement of the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 441 of 2020 decided on 21.09.2020, "Mohd. Yunus v. State of Uttarakhand & another".
In the light of the aforesaid judgment, these Writ Petitions are also disposed of in terms of the said judgment.
Consequently, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) (Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
25.02.2023 25.02.2023
Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!