Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2351 UK
Judgement Date : 19 August, 2023
SL. Office Notes,
No. Date reports,
orders or COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS
proceedings
or directions
and
Registrar's
order with
Signatures
WPMS No.1675 of 2015
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Vivek Pathak, learned counsel for respondent no.1.
3. Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.
4. During the course of argument, Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Advocate, has placed reliance on the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Rasiklal Manikchand Dhariwal and Another, vs. M.S.S food products, (2012) 2 SCC 196 and particularly, gives reference of Para 41 of the judgment and submits that the application under Order 9 Rule 7 of C.P.C is not maintainable.
5. Mr. Tapan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks some time to address on this point.
6. On his request, list this matter in the next week.
7. Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date of listing.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 19.08.2023 R.Bisht
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!