Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

"Smt. Qamar Jahan vs Buadutta" By
2022 Latest Caselaw 3205 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3205 UK
Judgement Date : 28 September, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
"Smt. Qamar Jahan vs Buadutta" By on 28 September, 2022
                      Office Notes,
                   reports, orders or
SL.                 proceedings or
         Date                                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No                   directions and
                   Registrar's order
                    with Signatures
      28.09.2022                        SA No.96 of 2022
                                        Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

The present proposed Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 22.07.2022, passed by the Ist Additional District Judge, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Civil Appeal No.2 of 2022, "Smt. Qamar Jahan vs. Buadutta" by which, the said appeal, filed by the present appellant, has been dismissed. The said appeal was filed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court, whereby the counter claim, filed by the respondent-defendant in the original suit, filed by the appellant- plaintiff, was decreed.

Heard Mr. T.A. Khan, the learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mohd. Sahfy, the learned counsel for the appellant.

The learned Senior Advocate submitted that the alleged sale deed was executed on 08.03.2006 by Mr. Maqbool Ahmad in the capacity of attorney of Mr. Lallu Khan. The said document was produced before the concerned Registrar. However, the said documents was registered only on 28.06.2011. Meanwhile, legal heirs of Mr. Lallu Khan had executed a sale deed of the same property in favour of the appellant on 21.06.2010 and the said deed was registered on the same day.

The learned Senior Advocate submitted that the concerned Registrar had no jurisdiction to register the said deed dated 08.03.2006 after lapse of more than five years.

The present Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-

(i) Whether the document in question, which had been executed by the attorney of the vendor on 08.03.2006 could be registered after an interval of five years on 28.06.2011 and even after the death of the said vendor and attorney?

(ii) Whether the Sub-Registrar can retain a document with him for the purpose of registration for a period of five years?

Issue notice to the respondent. Steps to be taken within a week. List this case on 06.12.2022.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 28.09.2022

Neha

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter