Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3420 UK
Judgement Date : 20 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE
20TH OCTOBER, 2022
WRIT PETITON (S/B) No. 607 OF 2022
Between:
Dr. Ashok Kumar.
...Petitioner
and
State of Uttarakhand and others.
...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Aishwarya Prakash Joshi and Mr.
Mayank Rajan Joshi, the learned
counsel.
Counsel for the respondents. : Mr. S.S. Chauhan, the learned Deputy
Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand/ respondents.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
Petitioner has preferred the present Writ
Petitions to seek the following reliefs :-
"I. direct the Respondent State to suitably amend the
Uttarakhand Government Servant (Discipline &
Appeal) Rules, 2003, so that the dignity & rights of
Government Servants are protected by prescribing
a timeline for the conclusion of disciplinary
proceedings initiated against the Government
Servants along with a separate Review Committee
established to review the orders, especially for
Government Servants placed under suspension."
2. In effect, the petitioner is seeking a mandamus
to direct the State to legislate in the manner that the
petitioner desires. Such a direction cannot be issued by
the Court. It is for the State to formulate its policies and,
on that basis, to legislate on the subjects, over which it
has legislative competence. The relief, as sought,
therefore, cannot be granted.
3. The submission of the learned counsel for the
petitioner is that the primary grievance of the petitioner is
with regard to the pendency of the disciplinary
proceedings initiated against him. He submits that the
enquiry has been completed by the Enquiry Officer, and
the report has been submitted before the Disciplinary
Authority. He submits that the Disciplinary Authority
should be required to complete the enquiry, and take a
decision in the matter on an early date.
4. Counsel for the respondents, who appears on
advance notice, points out that the petitioner himself had
sought an adjournment, as is evident from the
communication dated 23.07.2022 addressed to the
petitioner by the Enquiry Officer.
5. Since the matter is at the ex parte stage, and
we have not called for the counter affidavit of the
respondents, we proceed to dispose of this Writ Petition on
the basis of the statements made by the learned counsel
for the petitioner that the Enquiry Officer has concluded
2
the enquiry, and submitted the enquiry report to the
Disciplinary Authority.
6. If that be the case, the Disciplinary Authority
may proceed in accordance with law to bring the enquiry
proceedings to its logical conclusion within the next three
months, provided the petitioner cooperates, and does not
delay the further proceedings in the matter.
7. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the
aforesaid terms.
8. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
also stands disposed of.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
_____________
R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 20th October, 2022 Rahul
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!