Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3366 UK
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI VIPIN SANGHI
AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.C. KHULBE
17TH OCTOBER, 2022
FIRST APPEAL No. 172 OF 2022
Between:
Smt. Anjali ...........Appellant
and
Monu Kumar ......Respondent
Counsel for the appellant : Mr. Deepak Sharma.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, learned counsel
for the respondent / caveator.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made
the following
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
The present Appeal is barred by limitation by
90 days.
2. The appellant has preferred the present
Appeal to assail the ex parte judgment dated
09.05.2022 rendered by the Family Court in Original Suit
No. 21 of 2020 filed by the respondent to seek the
guardianship of the minor child under Section 25 of the
Guardians and Wards Act.
3. The case of the appellant is that she was not
served in the said proceedings. The impugned judgment
records otherwise.
4. The appellant has a remedy to seek setting
aside of the ex parte judgment by disclosing sufficient
cause before the same Court.
5. Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, learned counsel for the
respondent / caveator, points out that the impugned
judgment has also been executed, and this fact has not
been disclosed in the present Appeal.
6. In the aforesaid circumstances, we are not
inclined to entertain the present Appeal. The same is,
accordingly, dismissed.
7. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
also stands dismissed.
________________
VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
_____________
R.C. KHULBE, J.
Dt: 17th October, 2022 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!