Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1647 UK
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions and COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
Registrar's order with
Signatures
WPMS No. 2520 of 2017
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Shubham Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Deep Prakash Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner.
There is no representation for the respondent. This writ petition is directed against the judgment dated 01.09.2017 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Khatima, Udham Singh Nagar in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 54 of 2016 under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC. By the impugned judgment, defendant was restrained from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiff, over the property in question.
As per office report, Civil Suit No. 69 of 2016 has been decided by learned trial Court on 29.09.2021.
Since the Misc. Civil Appeal No. 54 of 2016 was filed challenging the interlocutory order, passed by learned trial Court in Civil Suit No. 69 of 2016 and now the Suit itself has been decided, therefore, nothing survives in this writ petition.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 26.05.2022 Navin
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!