Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1922 UK
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
SRI JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
AND
SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, J.
30TH JUNE, 2022
WRIT PETITION (CRL) No. 1207 OF 2022 Between:
Dinesh Singh and others. ....Petitioners
and
State of Uttarakhand and others. ...Respondents
: Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned counsel. Counsel for the petitioners.
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made the following
JUDGMENT : (per Sri Vipin Sanghi, C.J.)
The petitioners have preferred the present petition
to seek a direction to respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to provide
adequate police protection to the petitioners and their
families.
2. The petitioners claim that they are employees of
Vidit Akshay Vision Nidhi Limited, of which respondent Nos.
4 & 5 are the Directors. The said Company has gone in
default in repayment of monies to its creditors, and action
has been initiated against the Company and the Directors.
3. The petitioners apprehend threat to their and to
their family members' lives and liberty on account of the
aforesaid backdrop.
4. Mr. J.S. Virk, the learned Deputy Advocate
General for the State of Uttarakhand, on instructions, states
that the State shall take steps to ensure preservation of law
and order in this case.
5. In the light of the aforesaid, no further order is
required.
6. The writ petition stands dismissed.
7. In sequel thereto, pending application, if any,
stands disposed of.
________________ VIPIN SANGHI, C.J.
____________ S.K. MISHRA, J.
Dt: 30th June, 2022 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!