Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

ARBAP/11/2021
2022 Latest Caselaw 1835 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1835 UK
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
ARBAP/11/2021 on 24 June, 2022
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                 AT NAINITAL

                     SRI JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.

                              24th JUNE, 2022

      ARBITRATION APPLICATION No. 11 OF 2021

Between:

M/S Mathiyan Construction (Pvt.) Ltd.
                                                                  ...Petitioner
and

State of Uttarakhand and others.

                                                           ...Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner.         :    Mr. Pankaj    Purohit,    the    learned
                                         counsel.

Counsel for the respondents.        :    Mr. B.S. Parihar, the learned Standing
                                         Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.


Upon hearing the learned Counsel, the Court made
the following

JUDGMENT :

In this application, filed under sub-section (6)

of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act', for brevity),

the applicant has prayed for appointment of an

Arbitrator to resolve the controversy involved in the

case.

2. Mr. Pankaj Purohit, the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner, would draw the attention of

this Court to Clause 19 appearing at Page No. 21 of the brief, and would submit that there is an arbitration

clause. It is appropriate to take note of the exact words

used therein. Clause 19 reads as follows :-

"19. Settlement of Dipsutes.

Any dispute or differance between the Ex. Engineer and line contractor as to the rights or liabilities of the parties here to as to any matter or thing whatsoever arising under his contractor or concerning, is constive on wheather such dispute, or differance arises during the continuance of this contractor or after its datermination by completion or breach or otherwise how so ever shall in the first instance be reffered to the Sup Engineer who shall give his written decision thereon. Such written decision shall be final and binding on the parties unless the contractor within 14 days of the receipt there of gives the Ex.Engineer notice in writing object to such decision in which case and in any case in which the Sup. Engineer fails to give a writtan decision within 21 days after receipt or notice in writing given to him by the contractor requiring his decisionsuch dispute or differance shall be referred to an arbitrator agreed upon by both the parties or failing such agreement to an arbitrator appointed by the .................... and in either case the decision of the arbitrator (including his decision as or to eosis) shall be final and binding on both the parties and the cost of arbitration shall be born by the parties in such manner as the arbitrator may decide.

If any such dispute arises in consequence of an act of God or Civil commission and is referred to arbitration under the provision of this clause the arbitrator shall decide whether this contract shall continue or shall be datermined and shall in either case datermine the terms and conditions attendant on such continution or datermution."

3. It is not disputed by Mr. B.S. Parihar, the

learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand,

that there is an arbitration clause.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner,

therefore, submits that the sole Arbitrator may be

appointed to resolve the disputes between the parties.

The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the

learned counsel for the respondent agree for

appointment of Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh, Retd. Judge of

this Court, R/o H.N. 415-A, Lane no.-3, Arya Nagar,

P.O.- Arya Vanprastha Ashram, Jwalapur, Haridwar-

249407, as an Arbitrator.

5. As both the learned counsel are in agreement

for appointment of Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh, Retd.

Judge of this Court, R/o H.N. 415-A, Lane no.-3, Arya

Nagar, P.O.- Arya Vanprastha Ashram, Jwalapur,

Haridwar-249407, as an Arbitrator, this Court disposes

of this application by appointing Mr. Justice Lok Pal

Singh, Retd. Judge of this Court, R/o H.N. 415-A, Lane

no.-3, Arya Nagar, P.O.- Arya Vanprastha Ashram,

Jwalapur, Haridwar-249407, to act as an Arbitrator to

resolve the dispute between the parties.

6. Let the Arbitrator be intimated accordingly.

The learned Arbitrator shall, in terms of Section 11(8) of

the 1996 Act, furnish his disclosure in writing to this

Court within 15 days from the date of receipt of a

certified copy of this order. He shall, thereafter, fix his

remuneration, and charges towards other expenses, in

consultation with the parties to the dispute. He shall

endeavour to complete the arbitral proceedings, and to

pass an award with utmost expedition, preferably within

six months from the date on which he enters upon a

reference.

In sequel thereto, all pending applications

stand disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be supplied

to the learned counsel for the parties, as per Rules.

________________ S.K. MISHRA, A.C.J.

Dt: 24th June, 2022 Rahul

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter