Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Radha Dharamwal @ Radha Devi vs Almora Urban Co-Operative Bank & ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 4048 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4048 UK
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
Radha Dharamwal @ Radha Devi vs Almora Urban Co-Operative Bank & ... on 19 December, 2022
                                            1




        IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
                    AT NAINITAL


               Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3306 of 2022


Radha Dharamwal @ Radha Devi                                 ..................Petitioner

                                         -Versus-

Almora Urban Co-operative Bank & Another
                                      ..............Respondents

Present: Ms. Seema Dhingra, learned counsel for the petitioner.
         Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the respondents.



                Date of Hearing and Order: 19.12.2022

Sri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the Court has passed the following order:-

1. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for

the following reliefs:-

a. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

Certiorari quashing the vide notice dated 14.10.2022

and vide sale notice dated 19.11.2022 issued by the

respondent for taking the physical possession and

sale over the subject matter property situated at

Khasra 467 Min., Village Chandani Chowk,

Gurdaura, Pargana Bhawar Chhikhata, Tehsil-

Haldwani, District - Nainital, Uttarakhand and any

consequential proceedings in the interest of justice

thereon;

b. To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

Mandamus to decide all the representations made

before the concerning authorities, and

c. To issue any other Order, Writ or direction, which this

Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest

of justice considering facts and circumstances of this

case.

d. Award cost of the petition.

2. It is apparent from the record that the Bank is

proceeding under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act and

as per the ratio decided by "the State Bank of

Travancore Vs. Mathew K. C., (2018) 3 SCC 85", the writ

petition is not maintainable, as the petitioner has an

alternative remedy approaching the Debt Recovery

Tribunal.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner was given an

option by this Court for One Time Settlement (O.T.S.) by

making an up-front deposit, but the learned counsel for

the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is not

liable to be proceeded against under the SARFAESI Act

and she is not interested to avail the O.T.S. benefits and

is not ready to file any application for O.T.S.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would rely

upon a judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench of

this Court in WPMS No. 2021 of 2013 "Vijay Kumar &

Another Vs. Almora Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. &

Others, wherein the Coordinate Bench has held that in

view of Section 37 of the SARFAESI Act, it is absolutely

clear that the provisions of the SARFAESI Act are in

addition to, and not in derogation to any other law, but

Cooperative Banks are fully authorized and has

proceeded in accordance with law under Sections 70

and 71 of the Uttaranchal Co-operative Societies Act,

2003.

5. The learned counsel for the Bank would, however, rely

upon a reported case of "Pandurang Ganpati Chaugule

Vs. Vishwasrao Patil Murgud Sahakari Bank Limited,

(2020) 9 SCC 215", wherein the question that was

referred to the Constitution Bench for deciding if the

provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

Act, 2002, are applicable to Cooperative Bank.

6. After considering the matter at length, the Constitution

Bench has held as follows:-

"142. Resultantly, we answer the reference as

under:

142.1. (1)(a) The cooperative banks registered under

the State legislation and multi-State level cooperative

societies registered under the MSCS Act, 2002 with

respect to "banking" are governed by the legislation

relatable to Schedule VII List I Entry 45 of the

Constitution of India.

142.1. (b) The cooperative banks run by the

cooperative societies registered under the State

legislation with respect to the aspects of

"incorporation, regulation and winding up", in

particular, with respect to the matters which are

outside the purview of Schedule VII List I Entry 45 of

the Constitution of India, are governed by the said

legislation relatable to Schedule VII List II Entry 32 of

the Constitution of India.

142.2. (2) The cooperative banks involved in the

activities related to banking are covered within the

meaning of "banking company" defined under Section

5(c) read with Section 56(a) of the Banking Regulation

Act, 1949, which is a legislation relatable to List I

Entry 45. It governs the aspect of "banking" of

cooperative banks run by the cooperative societies.

The cooperative banks cannot carry on any activity

without compliance of the provisions of the Banking

Regulation Act, 1949 and any other legislation

applicable to such banks relatable to "banking" in

List I Entry 45 and the RBI Act relatable to Schedule

VII List I Entry 38 of the Constitution of India.

142.3. (3)(a) The cooperative banks under the State

legislation and multi-State cooperative banks are

"banks" under Section 2(1)(c) of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement

of Security Interest Act, 2002. The recovery is an

essential part of banking; as such, the recovery

procedure prescribed under Section 13 of

the Sarfaesi Act, a legislation relatable to Schedule

VII List I Entry 45 to the Constitution of India, is

applicable.

142.4. (3)(b) Parliament has legislative competence

under Schedule VII List I Entry 45 of the Constitution

of India to provide additional procedures for recovery

under Section 13 of the Securitisation and

Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement

of Security Interest Act, 2002 with respect to

cooperative banks. The provisions of Section 2(1)(c)(iv-

a), of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of

Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest

Act, 2002, adding "ex abundanti cautela", "a multi-

State cooperative bank" is not ultra vires as well as

the Notification dated 28-1-2003 issued with respect

to the cooperative banks registered under the State

legislation."

7. Thus, it is clear that the SARFAESI Act is applicable to

the Co-operative Banks and the State Banks and was

also guided by the Banking Regulations Act, 1959. In

that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed

being devoid of merits.

(Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J.) 19.12.2022 (Grant urgent certified copy of this order, as per Rules) A/-

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter