Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 859 UK
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (S/S) No.134 of 2021
Shri Dinesh Prakash Nautiyal ...... Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India and Others ..... Respondents
Mr. Siddhartha Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Adhikari, Advocate for the respondents.
JUDGMENT
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The petitioner is a person, who served in the Indian Army. He was released from the army on the medical ground. It is the case of the petitioner that despite having served the Indian army for more than 24 years, he has been denied pensionary benefits. Seeking those benefits, instant writ petition has been filed.
2. At the very outset, the Court wanted to know from the learned counsel for the petitioner, as to why should the instant writ petition be entertained in view of existence of Armed Forces Tribunal, constituted under the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007. At it, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with the liberty to file his claim before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
5. Liberty is granted.
6. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty, as above.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 12.03.2021 Sanjay
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!