Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/1725/2020
2021 Latest Caselaw 2035 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2035 UK
Judgement Date : 24 June, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1725/2020 on 24 June, 2021
                   Office Notes,
                reports, orders or
                 proceedings or
sl. No   Date                                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
                  directions and
                Registrar's order
                 with Signatures
                                     MCC No.12625 of 2021 (Time Extension Application)
                                     In
                                     WPMS No.1725 of 2020
                                     Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Via video conferencing).

List revised. None present for the petitioner.

Mr. Narain Dutt, Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Naresh Pant, Advocate, for the respondent.

This writ petition was filed before this Court, praying for setting aside the order dated 15.09.2020, as was passed by the District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Arbitration Case No.48 of 2019, "Project Director, National Highway Authority of India Vs. Bahadur Singh and another", by virtue of which, the application preferred by the petitioner, for the release of the amount deposited by the respondent no.1, was rejected.

This Court while considering the writ petition vide its judgment, as rendered on 05.01.2021, had disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, to deal with the proceedings of the Arbitration Case Nos.48 of 2019 and 47 of 2019, and they were directed to be disposed of by the District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar within a period of three months.

Today the matter is listed on an application, which has been received on an administrative side from the District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, making a request that on account of the ailment of the counsel, who was conducted the proceedings of the aforesaid arbitration cases, the matter could not be decided within the time period, as provided by this Court.

In that eventuality, and particularly, taking into consideration the ground that the counsel who was supposed to conduct the matter was not well, the time extension application sought for is quite justified and the same would stands allowed.

The time period as granted by this Court vide its judgment dated 05.01.2021, is extended and the District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, is requested to decide the aforesaid arbitration cases within a further extended period of three months from today.

Subject to the above, the time extension application stands disposed of.

(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 24.06.2021

NR/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter