Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WPMS/1603/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 3104 UK

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3104 UK
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2021

Uttarakhand High Court
WPMS/1603/2021 on 16 August, 2021
                   Office Notes,
                reports, orders or
                 proceedings or
sl. No   Date                                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
                  directions and
                Registrar's order
                 with Signatures
                                     WPMS No.1603 of 2021
                                     Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

(Via video conferencing).

Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Rakesh Kunwar, Additional CSC, for the State of Uttarakhand.

To be precise, and without venturing into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the grievance which has been raised by the petitioner in the writ petition is that the respondent No.2, has passed the impugned Notice No.148, dated 08.07.2021, whereby, the Forest Department is intending to conduct a survey. The notice, thus, issued on 08.07.2021, and which is impugned in the writ petition rather shows that the respondent No.2, had issued notices to as many as six private persons, whose property is likely to be surveyed in pursuance to the said impugned notice.

The grievance of the petitioner is that he is already contesting a suit being Suit No.120 of 2015, "M/s Hicks Thermometer India Ltd. Vs. Shri Sunil Kumar Goyal", and the same is already pending consideration before the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun. In that eventuality, if any measurement or the survey is being conducted by the respondent No.2, it may be having a bearing on the pending proceedings before the court of Civil Judge, (Senior Division), Dehradun. His only grievance is that in case, if the respondent No.2, at all intends to conduct any survey, he too should have been called upon to participate in the survey, so that the petitioner may be heard qua his rights as against Mr. Sunil Goyal, whose name is shown at S.No.2 in the impugned Notice No.148, dated 08.07.2021, against whom, the principal suit, is already pending consideration before competent civil court.

Hence, the writ petition is being disposed of with a request to the respondent No.2, that in case of in any eventuality, if he conducts any survey in pursuance to the Notice No.148, dated 08.07.2021, apart from the private persons, who have already been called upon to participate in the survey, the petitioner too would be issued with the notices; before any actual survey is conducted, and he too would be given his right of participation in the survey, as it has been given to the other private persons. Any report of the survey, which has been or likely to be conducted, if it is submitted, after the conduct of the survey in pursuance to the Notice No.148, dated 08.07.2021, will obviously abide by the judgment, which may be taken in Suit No.120 of 2015, "M/s Hicks Thermometer India Ltd. Vs. Shri Sunil Kumar Goyal".

Subject to the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 16.08.2021

NR/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter