Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1634 Tri
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
RSA No. 32 of 2024
Sri Sumati Ranjan Chakma,
......Appellant(s)
Versus
Smt. Dayamanti Chakma & Ors.
......Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Chakraborty, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
_O_R_D_E_R_
24.09.2024
Hear Mr. P. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant.
Mr. Chakraborty, learned counsel submits that total 9(nine)
numbers of documents were proved into evidence on behalf of the
appellant-defendant no.1 but Ld. First Appellate Court except
Exbt.1, a Khatian, proved from the side of plaintiff-respondent did
not take into consideration a single document submitted either
from the side of plaintiff-respondent or from the side of
defendant-appellant, rendering a perverse decision.
Considered the submission and also perused the record.
The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question
of law.
"Whether the judgment of Ld. First Appellate Court is perverse for not taking into consideration of the relevant documents as proved by the parties, more particularly documents proved by appellant-defendant no.1."
The appeal may also be heard on any other substantial
question of law at the time of hearing.
Call for the LCRs.
Issue notice upon the respondents by registered post with
A/D.
Step to be taken by the appellant within 7 days in this
regard.
The Registry will prepare the paper book after receiving of
LCRs.
List the matter in its usual course.
JUDGE
SUJAY GHOSH Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH Date: 2024.09.24 17:46:24 +05'30'
Riki
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!