Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 67 Tri
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2024
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
MAT.APP. No.15/2023
Smt. Debalina Choudhury
......... Appellant(s).
VERSUS
Sri Anup Kumar Banda
.........Respondent(s).
For Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. Kawsik Nath, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pulak Saha, Advocate, Mr. S. Talapatra, Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. PURKAYASTHA
Order 22/01/2024
An affidavit has been filed by the respondent stating that he has
remarried on 05.12.2023, i.e. after the period of limitation of 30 days
prescribed under Section 19(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 was over. As
such, his remarriage is not hit under Section 15 of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955.
Mr. Kawsik Nath, learned counsel for the appellant, submits
that the appeal has been filed within the period of 90 days prescribed under
Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 which is applicable to the
appeal at hand arising out of a judgment of the Family Court in view of the
notification dated 27.09.2023.
Be that as it may, since the respondent has appeared and lower
Court records have been received, the appeal is admitted for hearing.
Paper Book be prepared.
List the matter for hearing in due course.
(S.D. PURKAYASTHA), J (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Pulak
PULAK BANIK Date: 2024.01.29 16:25:53 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!