Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 179 Tri
Judgement Date : 21 February, 2023
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
RSA No.26 of 2021
For Appellant(s) : Mr. S. M. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate
Ms. Ankita Pal, Advocate
For respondent(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH
Order 21/02/2023
Heard Mr. S. M. Chakraborty, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Ankita Pal, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
It is seen that the instant second appeal was admitted without framing substantial question of law. As such, this Court has taken up the matter to frame substantial questions of law involved in this appeal as urged by Mr. Chakraborty, learned senior counsel for the appellants as well as Mr. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel for the respondents. Accordingly, the following substantial question of law has been formulated:-
"Whether the judgment of the first appellate court is perverse in view of the fact that the learned first appellate court did not consider the pleadings as well as evidence surfaced during the course of trial?"
Paperbook has already been prepared.
List the matter on 16.03.2023.
JUDGE Rohit
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!