Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 667 Tri
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2023
Page 1 of 3
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Crl.A. No.16 of 2023
and
IA No.01/2023 in Crl.A. No.16 of 2023
Shri Krishan Das alias Chan
.........Applicant/Appellant(s)
Versus
The State of Tripura
.........Respondent(s)
For Applicant/Appellant(s) : Mr. Biswajit Debnath, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ratan Datta, Public Prosecutor. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH Order 22/08/2023
Crl.A. No.16 of 2023
Admit.
Call for the lower court records from the concerned court.
Office to prepare Paper Book.
Matter be listed for hearing in usual course.
IA No.01/2023 in Crl.A. No.16 of 2023
Heard learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and learned
Public Prosecutor on the prayer for suspension of sentence made through IA
No.01 of 2023.
The applicant/appellant stands convicted for the offences
punishable under Section-8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
(POCSO) Act, 2012 vide impugned Judgment of conviction and sentence dated
17.07.2023, passed by the Ld. Special Judge (POCSO), West Tripura, Agartala
in Case No. Special (POCSO) 30 of 2018. The applicant/appellant has been
sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment (SI) for 3(three) years and to pay fine
of Rs.20,000/- for the offence punishable under Section-8 of the POCSO Act,
in default of payment of fine, the convict shall suffer simple imprisonment (SI)
for further 1(one) month. The applicant/appellant has been acquitted of the
charges under Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC.
Mr. Biswajit Debnath, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant
submits that no charges under Section-8 of the POCSO Act, were framed. The
learned Trial Court has disbelieved the allegations of rape made by the
informant-mother. It is submitted that the victim was subjected to medical
examination on 6th April, 2018 that is on the next date of the incidence.
However, no semen or stain or blood etc. were found from the samples
collected from the victim. The birth date of the victim was also not properly
evidenced to determine the exact age of the victim. DW-1 and 2 both have
stated that there is previous enmity between the informant's family and the
appellant/applicant. The learned Judicial Magistrate before whom the statement
under Section 164(5) of the Cr.P.C. was recorded has also not been examined.
It is further submitted that the statements made under Section 164(5) is a
tutored version by the victim. As such, the applicant/appellant who has been all
along on bail during trial, may be granted privilege of suspension of sentence
and the provisional bail granted by the learned Trial Court may be confirmed.
Learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the prayer.
Having considered the rival submissions of learned counsel for the
parties and having gone through the impugned judgment and also the period of
sentence imposed upon the appellant/applicant, this Court is inclined to grant
the privilege of suspension of sentence to the applicant/appellant by confirming
the provisional bail granted by the learned Trial Court subject to the conditions
that appellant/applicant and his bailors shall submit their Aadhaar Card and
mobile number before the learned Trial Court within a period of 2(two) weeks
from today. They shall not change their address and mobile numbers without
permission of the learned Trial Court.
Application stands disposed of.
Digitally signed by
APARESH APARESH KUMAR SINGH
KUMAR SINGH Date: 2023.08.22
21:28:18 +05'30'
(APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Munna S MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2023.08.23 16:37:49 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!