Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Nirode Chandra Das vs M/S Rajlaxmi Bricks Industries & ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 638 Tri

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 638 Tri
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2023

Tripura High Court
Sri Nirode Chandra Das vs M/S Rajlaxmi Bricks Industries & ... on 16 August, 2023
                                      Page 1 of 3




                        HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                              AGARTALA
                                 CRP No.39/2023

Sri Nirode Chandra Das
                                                       ......... Plaintiff/Petitioner(s).
                               VERSUS
M/S Rajlaxmi Bricks Industries & others
                                        .........Defendant/Respondent(s).

For Plaintiff/Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sankar Deb, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Abir Baran, Advocate.

For Defendant/Respondent(s) : None.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH

Order 16/08/2023

The relevant page-38 of the judgment passed in Title Suit

No.05 of 2014 has been supplied. The complete paragraph-40 now reads as

under:

"[40] It is seen that the business of the partnership firm was closed w.e.f. 30.06.2012 and all accessories relating to manufacturing and burning of bricks have been lifted by the defendants and there is no possibility of reopening the partnership business. For the interest of all the partners, both the plaintiff and defendants wants the partnership firm to dissolve. The DW-1, who is one of the partner also stated in his examination-in-chief that defendants have no objection to dissolve the firm as prayed by the plaintiff. The share of the plaintiff in the profit and loss of the business carried out by the partnership is 20% and that of defendant No. 2 is 44.98%, defendant No. 3 is 25%, defendant No. 4 is 10%, defendant No. 5 is 0.02% and it has been mentioned in the Deed of

Partnership marked as Exbt. 1 Series. So, the plaintiff and defendants will have to share the profit and loss of the business of the firm as per the share mentioned in the Deed of Partnership after dissolution of the firm. The plaintiff and defendants have placed separate statement of accounts and audit report of the firm. They have engaged their choice of Chartered Accountant for preparation of those statement of Account and Audit report. Defendants have produced computer typed Cash book marked as Exbt. I, J, K, L and Ledger book marked as Exbt. E, F, G, H, respectively (subject to objection) and those Cash book and Ledger book have created doubt regarding its authenticity in the mind of this court. Generally, entries in the Cash books and Ledger books are made on daily basis showing daily transaction of business. The cashier or any competent person authorized, put signature after completion of making entries. But, in this instance case, the Cash books and Ledger books produced by the defendants does not have entry in the cash books regarding daily business of the firm. It seems that the defendants have made those Cash books and Ledger books in a hurry, soon after the dispute erupted between partners to show that daily business of the firm is maintained properly. So, with this documents in hand, this court cannot come to conclusion in deciding the share of the partners. Besides that without dissolution of the firm, it is not wise to decide and declare the share of the partners in a partnership firm. The business of the firm came to an end just after three years of start of its business and the partnership firm could not be dissolve amicable between the partners inspite of attempt made by the plaintiff for amicable settlement. Thus, from the above discussion, I am of the considered view that the partnership firm name and style as "M/S. Rajlaxmi Bricks Industries" situated at Ratanpur under Belonia Sub-Division has to be dissolve and the statement of accounts and audit report shall be prepared afresh by a competent Chartered Accountant relying on the actual documents of the firm and on the basis of Statement of Accounts and Audited Reports, the plaintiff is entitled to get his share in the business of

the firm as per the terms and condition of the Deed of Partnership. So, issue No. (iv) and (viii) are decided in favour of the plaintiff."

Mr. Sankar Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Abir

Baran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the decree

has not been prepared in terms of the last findings of the learned trial Court

which states that the plaintiff after dissolution of the firm and on the basis of

the statement of accounts and audited reports to be prepared by the

Chartered Accountant, will be entitled to get his share in the business of the

firm as per the terms and condition of the deed of partnership. The decree is

silent on the share of the plaintiff and other defendants.

Issue notice on the respondents under ordinary process and

registered cover with A/D, for which requisites be filed within one week.

Notice is made returnable on 20.09.2023.

(APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ

PULAK BANIK Date: 2023.08.17 18:07:03 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter