Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 880 Tri
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2021
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Cont.Cas(C) No.57/2021
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. A. Debbarma, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Pal, Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI
Order
09/09/2021
The respondents are authorities of Tripura Khadi and Village
Industries Board. In a judgment dated 07.01.2021 they were directed to
release the remaining gratuity of the petitioners by applying revised limit of
Rs.20 lakhs. Time of four months from the date of the judgment was granted
for such purpose. So far these directions are not complied. Only defence
orally raised before me is that the Khadi Board has challenged the judgment
and the writ appeal is pending before the Division Bench. Mere filing of an
appeal or pendency of the appeal without stay order is not a ground to avoid
Court directions, that too for an unreasonable period of time. Nine months
have passed since the Court directed the respondents to take certain steps.
This should have been sufficient for the respondents to obtain stay against
the directions if so desired.
As a last chance, list the matter on 07.10.2021 by which time
the respondents shall comply with the directions if no stay is granted by the
Division Bench. In the event of neither stay nor compliance, Chairman of
the Khadi Board shall remain personally present to answer the contempt
charges.
(AKIL KURESHI), CJ
Pulak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!