Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 58 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.6760 of 2026
25.03.2026
Between:
Kotha Naresh Kumar
...Petitioner
AND
The Union of India,
Represented by its Secretary,
Ministry of Finance,
New Delhi & 10 others
...Respondents
ORDER:
Heard Sri B.Krishna Karthik, learned counsel for the
petitioner, Sri T.Jaswanth Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for
Central Government appearing for respondent No.1, Sri
B.Srihari, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.7 and Sri
Sudharshan Narahari, learned counsel for respondent No.10.
Perused the record.
2. None appeared for remaining respondents.
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel
for petitioner submitted that the issue raised in this Writ Petition
is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.18913 of 2024, dated 22.08.2024 and therefore, the same
order may be passed in this writ petition as well. The operative
portion of the said order reads as under:
"8. In view of the above circulars, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the respondents to ensure that the agents engaged by them for recovery of the loan amounts, shall strictly follow the guidelines and instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India and also the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in ICICI Bank Ltd Vs. Prakash Kaur's case (1 supra) and ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma's case (2 supra).
9. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs."
4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1, 7 & 10 have no
objection.
5. Accordingly, in terms of the order passed by this Court in
W.P.No.18913 of 2024, dated 22.08.2024, and for the reasons
alike, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent
authorities and their agents to scrupulously follow the
guidelines/instructions issued by the Reserve Bank of India in its
Circular dated 12.08.2022 and also the judgments of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Prakash Kaur' 1s case and
ICICI Bank v. Shanti Devi Sharma' 2s case, while recovering the
loan amounts from the petitioner. No costs.
1 (2007) 2 SCC 711 2 (2008) 7 SCC 532
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
____________________________ NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
Dated:25.03.2026 AQS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!