Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Polepaka Aruna vs The State Of Telangana
2026 Latest Caselaw 5 Tel

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Polepaka Aruna vs The State Of Telangana on 25 March, 2026

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

                 WRIT PETITION No.14519 of 2018

                   DATE OF ORDER: 25.03.2026

BETWEEN:

Polepaka Aruna and others.
                                                         ... Petitioners
AND

The State of Telangana, rep. by its
Prl.Secretary to Revenue, and others.
                                                       ... Respondents

                              : ORDER :

This writ petition is filed to declare the high-handed action of

the respondents in attempting to demolish and dispossess the

petitioners from their residential houses, each constructed on an

area of 120 square yards in Sy.No.308 of Desaipeta Village,

Warangal Urban Mandal, Warangal District, without notice and

without following the due procedure established by law, as illegal

and arbitrary.

2. Heard Sri Sumith Raj, learned counsel representing Sri

P.Sasidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners on record and

learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that

petitioner No.1 is the owner and possessor of house site

admeasuring 120 square yards in Sy.No.308 of Desaipeta Village,

Warangal Urban Mandal, Warangal District, which was assigned to

the petitioner vide file No.A2/A3/3138/2002, dated 03.05.2006;

that prior to issuance of assigned patta in favour of petitioner No.1,

her ancestors were in possession of the said patta. Likewise,

petitioners 2 to 6 were the owners of the residential house sites

admeasuring 120 square yards each in Sy.No.308 of Desaipeta

Village, Warangal Urban Mandal, Warangal District (for short

'subject plots'), having acquired the same by way of assignment of

pattas vide file No.A2/A3/3138/2002, dated 03.05.2006 and are in

possession and enjoyment of the same.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that an

extent of Ac.74.00 guntas in Sy.No.308, is a Government land and

the same has been covered by house site pattas assigned by the

Government from time to time, to the landless poor people who have

constructed small houses thereon and are residing therein. While

the matter stood thus, on 20.04.2018, respondent No. 4, along with

his staff, came to the subject plots and warned the petitioners to

vacate their houses, failing which the same would be demolished;

that on 21.04.2018, the respondent No.4 along with Revenue

Inspector and VRO with the help of local police came to the subject

plots of the petitioners and demolished the structures therein.

Aggrieved by the said high-handed action, the petitioners

approached this Court by way of filing present writ petition and this

Court vide order dated 23.04.2018 granted status quo to be

maintained as on the date of the order.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that

before taking the drastic step of demolishing the structures, the

respondents neither issued notice to the petitioners nor followed

due process as provided under law. Therefore, prayed to allow the

writ petition.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue by

referring to the counter affidavit would submit that the petitioners

were assigned pattas to an extent of 120 square yards each vide file

No.A2/A3/3138/2002, dated 03.05.2006; that as per the norms

and conditions of the said assignment of house sites, the assignees

were required to construct houses within a period of three years

from the date of assignment. However, in the present case, the

petitioners being assignees, failed to construct houses within the

stipulated period. Therefore, the respondents are entitled to

reclaim/resume the assigned plots in terms of clause-6 of the

Assignment of Pattas. She further submits that the subject plots are

located in the middle of Warangal city i.e., within a distance of 2

K.Ms. from the Mandal Head Quarters, and the same are required

for allotment of Government Flagship programmes. She further

submits that in view of violation of the terms and conditions of the

Assignment of Pattas, the respondents were justified in taking

action against the petitioners and thus the writ petition is devoid of

merits and the same is liable to be dismissed.

7. A perusal of record would disclose that each petitioner was

allotted an extent of 120 square yards by way of Assignment of

Pattas vide File No.A2/A3/3138/2002, dated 03.05.2006, subject to

certain conditions. One of such condition i.e.,clause-6 is that the

assignee shall construct a house within a period of three years from

the date of assignment, failing which the respondents are entitled to

reclaim/resume the assigned plots.

8. In the present case, it is the specific contention of the

respondents that the petitioners failed to fulfill the condition

stipulated under clause-6 of the Assignment of Pattas. Therefore,

the respondents are justified in taking steps to resume the plots

along with the structures thereon. The Photographs placed on

record along with the writ petition indicate that a newly constructed

tin sheds have been raised in the subject plots. There is no evidence

to show that the structures were raised long ago and that

petitioners are residing therein as contended by the petitioners.

9. However, the fact remains that, before taking drastic step of

demolishing the structures of the petitioners, the respondents did

not issue any notice to the petitioners, in clear violation of the

principles of natural justice. Further, the subject plots were

assigned to the petitioners in the year 2006, whereas the

respondents resorted to demolition of the structures in the year

2018, that too without issuing any notice.

10. In the light of the above the Writ Petition is disposed of with a

direction to the respondents to follow the due procedure as provided

under law for resumption of the subject plots assigned to the

petitioners in terms of Clause-6 of the Assignment of Plots, by duly

issuing notice and affording opportunity of hearing to the

petitioners. Till such time both the parties shall maintain status

quo. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Date: 25.03.2026 tk

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

WRIT PETITION No.14519 of 2018

Dt.25.03.2026

tk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter