Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sameena Begum And 3 Others vs Dolphin Hotels Ltd., And Another
2026 Latest Caselaw 33 Tel

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 33 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Sameena Begum And 3 Others vs Dolphin Hotels Ltd., And Another on 25 March, 2026

         IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                         AT HYDERABAD

           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY


                        M.A.C.M.A.No.923 of 2019

                             DATE: 25.03.2026
Between:
Sameena Begum and three others.
                                                               .....Appellants
                                    AND
Dolphin Hotels Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director,
Ramoji Film City, Anajpur (V), Hayathnagar (M),
Ranga Reddy District.
and another.

                                                              ....Respondents

                                JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants challenging the

judgment and decree dated 31.08.2009 passed in O.P.No.121 of 2008 by

the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional Chief Judge, City

Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short "the Tribunal"), whereby the Tribunal

awarded a compensation of Rs.3,65,000/- with interest at 7.5% per annum

from the date of petition till realization against the claim of Rs.10,00,000/-

for the death of one Mohammad Shabbir (hereinafter referred as "the

deceased"), in a motor vehicle accident.

2. The learned counsel for the appellants/claimants contended that the

Tribunal erred in taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs.2,500/-

as against the claim of Rs.4,000/- and also failed to properly apply future

prospects and conventional heads; and as such prayed for enhancement of

compensation.

3. On the other hand, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent

No.2/Insurance Company contended that the Tribunal, in the absence of

cogent evidence regarding proof of income, has rightly assessed the notional

income and the compensation awarded is just and reasonable, requiring no

interference.

4. As seen from the material placed on record, on 17.07.2007, while the

deceased was proceeding on a motor-cycle bearing No. AP 10 AC 6309, a

bus bearing No.AP 29U 2057, driven in a rash and negligent manner,

dashed the motor-cycle, resulting in his death. There is no dispute with

regard to the accident and the involvement of the crime vehicle. The primary

grievance of the appellants is the inadequate quantum of compensation. The

appellants/claimants asserted that the monthly income of the deceased was

Rs.10,000/-. The Tribunal took the monthly income of the deceased as

Rs.2,500/- and assessed the compensation. Considering the profession of

the deceased as a Technician/Mechanic and the cost of living at the time of

the accident occurred in the year 2007, this Court deems it appropriate to

take the monthly income as Rs.4,000/-. Adding 40% towards future

prospects as per National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi 1, the

monthly income comes to Rs.5,600/- (Rs.4,000/- + Rs.1,600/-). After

deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses, the monthly contribution comes

to Rs.3,733/-. Since the deceased was 24 years old at the time of the

accident, as per the decision in Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport

Corporation 2, the appropriate multiplier is '18'. Thus, the annual

contribution of the deceased is Rs.44,796/-, and using multiplier 18, the

total loss of dependency comes to Rs.8,06,328/- (Rs.44,796/- x 18).

Further, as per the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in

Pranay Sethi's case (supra), the appellants/claimants are also entitled to

Rs.91,000/- (Rs.70,000/- + 10% enhancement for every three years) under

the conventional heads. The amount of Rs.10,000/- awarded under the

head loss of love and affection can be maintained. Accordingly, the total

compensation comes to Rs.9,07,328/- (Rs.8,06,328/- + Rs.91,000/- +

Rs.10,000/-).

5. In the result, this appeal is partly allowed by enhancing the

compensation from Rs.3,65,000/- to Rs.9,07,328/- with interest at 7.5% per

annum from the date of petition till realization. The respondents are directed

to deposit the compensation amount with interest within two months from

the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The remaining terms and

conditions of the Tribunal shall stand unaltered. No order as to costs.

1(2017) 16 SCC 680

(2009) 6 SCC 121

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

________________________________ JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Date: 25.03.2026 SCS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter