Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 197 Tel
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
Contempt Case No.119 of 2026
Date: 31.03.2026
Between:
Mohd. Rizwan Yonus
.....Petitioner
AND
Sri Ghansiram
The Tahsildar, Mahabubnagar. ....Respondent
ORDER
This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order
dated 13.06.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.15991 of
2025.
2. This Court vide order dated 13.06.2025 disposed of
W.P.No.15991 of 2025, which reads as follows:
"6. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to make F-Line application, duly enclosing the documents and land particulars, which are necessary for conducting survey and in the event of such an application being submitted by the petitioner and if the petitioner fulfils all the requirements mentioned in the circulars issued by the Commissioner, Survey, Settlements and Land Records from time to time, respondent No.5 shall conduct the survey, after issuing notices to all the persons interested and adjacent pattadars and after considering their objections, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of the application."
3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has filed
counter affidavit of the respondent and submitted that the respondent
has complied with the order dated 13.06.2025 passed by this Court in
W.P.No.15991 of 2025 and issued Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 vide
No.F/MS/3805/2025. It is further submitted that the said endorsement
was duly served on the petitioner.
4. A copy of the Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 has been placed
before this Court. The relevant portion of the said endorsement reads as
follows:
"Through the reference 4th cited, the Mandal Surveyor, Mahabubnagar, has reported that the tippons of the 27.11.2025 at 10:30 AM subject lands are not available. However, as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court, the Mandal Surveyor issued notices fixing the date of demarcation as to all interested persons and adjacent pattadars. He proceeded to the subject land along with the petitioner and attempted to trace the boundaries of Sy. Nos. 566 and 567 with the help of the Village Map. However, the boundaries could not be fixed as several private layouts have come up in and around the said survey numbers.
Therefore, the Mandal Surveyor could not fix the boundaries of the land Sy.Nos. 566 and 567 of Mahabubnagar Town."
5. This Court, in W.P.No.15991 of 2025 directed the respondent to
consider the petitioner's application for conducting an F-Line survey
and to conduct the survey if the petitioner fulfilled the requisite
requirements. Since the respondent has acted upon the application and
issued an Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 explaining the technical
inability to fix boundaries due to the non-availability of tippons and the
emergence of private layouts, it cannot be said that there is any willful
or deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. If the
petitioner is aggrieved by the said Endorsement, it is open to him to
challenge the same by filing an appeal before the competent authority
or by availing remedies available under law. However, the present
Contempt Case is not the appropriate remedy to adjudicate upon the
merits of the Endorsement issued by the respondent. In view of the
above facts and circumstances, this Court finds no merit in the
Contempt Case.
6. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________________ JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Date: 31.03.2026 Bw
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!