Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd Rizwan Younus vs Sri. Ghansiram
2026 Latest Caselaw 197 Tel

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 197 Tel
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Telangana High Court

Mohd Rizwan Younus vs Sri. Ghansiram on 31 March, 2026

        IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
                        AT HYDERABAD

           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

                        Contempt Case No.119 of 2026

                                 Date: 31.03.2026

Between:

Mohd. Rizwan Yonus
                                                                           .....Petitioner
                                          AND

Sri Ghansiram
The Tahsildar, Mahabubnagar.                                           ....Respondent

                                        ORDER

This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order

dated 13.06.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.15991 of

2025.

2. This Court vide order dated 13.06.2025 disposed of

W.P.No.15991 of 2025, which reads as follows:

"6. In view of the above submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition permitting the petitioner to make F-Line application, duly enclosing the documents and land particulars, which are necessary for conducting survey and in the event of such an application being submitted by the petitioner and if the petitioner fulfils all the requirements mentioned in the circulars issued by the Commissioner, Survey, Settlements and Land Records from time to time, respondent No.5 shall conduct the survey, after issuing notices to all the persons interested and adjacent pattadars and after considering their objections, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of the application."

3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has filed

counter affidavit of the respondent and submitted that the respondent

has complied with the order dated 13.06.2025 passed by this Court in

W.P.No.15991 of 2025 and issued Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 vide

No.F/MS/3805/2025. It is further submitted that the said endorsement

was duly served on the petitioner.

4. A copy of the Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 has been placed

before this Court. The relevant portion of the said endorsement reads as

follows:

"Through the reference 4th cited, the Mandal Surveyor, Mahabubnagar, has reported that the tippons of the 27.11.2025 at 10:30 AM subject lands are not available. However, as per the directions of the Hon'ble High Court, the Mandal Surveyor issued notices fixing the date of demarcation as to all interested persons and adjacent pattadars. He proceeded to the subject land along with the petitioner and attempted to trace the boundaries of Sy. Nos. 566 and 567 with the help of the Village Map. However, the boundaries could not be fixed as several private layouts have come up in and around the said survey numbers.

Therefore, the Mandal Surveyor could not fix the boundaries of the land Sy.Nos. 566 and 567 of Mahabubnagar Town."

5. This Court, in W.P.No.15991 of 2025 directed the respondent to

consider the petitioner's application for conducting an F-Line survey

and to conduct the survey if the petitioner fulfilled the requisite

requirements. Since the respondent has acted upon the application and

issued an Endorsement dated 11.12.2025 explaining the technical

inability to fix boundaries due to the non-availability of tippons and the

emergence of private layouts, it cannot be said that there is any willful

or deliberate disobedience of the orders passed by this Court. If the

petitioner is aggrieved by the said Endorsement, it is open to him to

challenge the same by filing an appeal before the competent authority

or by availing remedies available under law. However, the present

Contempt Case is not the appropriate remedy to adjudicate upon the

merits of the Endorsement issued by the respondent. In view of the

above facts and circumstances, this Court finds no merit in the

Contempt Case.

6. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY Date: 31.03.2026 Bw

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter