Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 263 Tel
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.3086 of 2026
DATE OF ORDER: 01.04.2026
Between:
Sri. Bilal Ahamed and one other.
...Petitioners
AND
The State of Telangana, Municipal Administration and Urban Development
Department and four others.
...Respondents
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader
for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for
respondent No.1, Sri.Raparthi Venkatesh, learned standing counsel for
GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5.
2. This writ petition has being filed seeking the following prayer:-
"a) to declare the action of the Respondent No. 4 and 5 in issuing the impugned Speaking Order dated 09.01.2026, directing the Petitioner to remove the alleged deviation to construction within 15 days, as being bad, arbitrary, high-handed, illegal, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not to take any coercive steps in respect of construction in Bearing Plot No.74, in Portion L and O in Survey No.41/Part and Plot No.75 Block No."O" admeasuring 600 Sq.yards, situated at Parama Reddy Hills, Upperpally Village, Attapur Circle, Ranga Reddy Circle.
b) Consequently set aside the impugned Speaking Order dated 09.01.2026 issued by the Respondent No.4."
3. Learned standing counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5 placed
on record instructions issued by the respondent No.5, wherein it is submitted
that on 17.11.2025, one Habeedbuddin Qureshi made a complaint alleging
that the petitioners are making unauthorized construction on the subject
property. On such complaint, the subject property was inspected and the
respondent authorities issued notice dated 21.11.2025 under Section 635 of the
GHMC Act, 1955. Thereafter, show cause notice dated 24.11.2025 was issued
and subsequently speaking order dated 09.01.2026 was also issued. Learned
standing counsel further submits that the subject property is sealed and
submits that the respondent authorities would take appropriate action
including removal/demolishing of the subject property.
4. At this stage, Sri.Ram Singhal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
counsel for the petitioners through virtual mode sought permission of this
Court to withdrawn this writ petition with a liberty to seek appropriate
remedy as available under law.
5. Recording the above submission, permission is accorded to the
petitioners to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail appropriate
remedy as available under law.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel,
I.A.No.3 of 2026 (Implead petition) and other miscellaneous petitions, if any,
pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.
_________________________ N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J Dated: 01.04.2026 Note:-
Issue C.C by tomorrow.
B/o Su
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!