Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2948 Tel
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2025
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Income Tax Tribunal Appeal No.92 of 2015
JUDGMENT:
(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Mr. J.V. Prasad, learned Senior Standing Counsel for
Income Tax, appearing on behalf of the appellant.
2. The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,
1961, has been preferred by the Revenue as the appellant against the
order dated 15.10.2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
Bench-A, Hyderabad, in I.T.A.No.731/Hyd/2012 for the Assessment
Year 2003-04.
3. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued a Circular,
viz., Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024, amending the previous
Circular No.5 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, by further enhancing the
monetary limits for filing appeals by the Income Tax Department
before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High Courts and Supreme
Court as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph no.2 of the
said Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal
before the High Court is Rs.2.00 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetary limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in terms
of the aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024 dated 17.09.2024. However, if
the appeal comes within the exception of Circular No.5 of 2024, it
would be open to the Income Tax Department to seek revival of the
appeal. No costs.
6. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall
stand closed.
__________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J
_________________________________ NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J
Date: 10.03.2025 Ndr
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!