Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 379 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 July, 2025
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL No.82 of 2010
JUDGMENT:
(per the Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)
Heard Ms. J.Sunitha, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax
Department appearing on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. Tarun Chadha,
learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. Karthik Ramana Puttamreddy,
learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The instant appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has
been preferred by the Revenue as the appellant against the order dated
23.03.2007, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench
'A', Hyderabad, in I.T.A.No.566/Hyd/2002 for the Assessment Year 1997-98.
3. Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued Circular No.9 of 2024
dated 17.09.2024, amending the previous Circular No.5 of 2024 dated
15.03.2024, by further enhancing the monetary limits for filing appeals by the
Income Tax Department before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunals, High
Courts and Supreme Court as a measure for reducing litigation. In paragraph 2
of the said Circular, we find that the monetary limit fixed for filing an appeal
before the High Court is Rs.2 crore.
4. In the instant appeal, tax effect is well below the monetary limit.
5. Therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed in terms of the
aforesaid Circular No.9 of 2024, dated 17.09.2024. However, if the appeal
comes within the exception of Circular No.5 of 2024, it would be open to the
Revenue to seek revival of the appeal.
6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J
_______________________________ NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA, J
Date: 14.07.2025 GSD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!