Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 790 Tel
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2025
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
COMMERCIAL COURT APPEAL No.43 of 2021
JUDGMENT:
(Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. J.Prabhakar, learned Senior Counsel
representing Mr. Ragolla Harish, learned counsel for the
appellant.
Mr. Srinivas Velagapudi, learned counsel for
respondent No.1.
2. With consent of learned counsel for the parties,
the appeal is heard finally.
3. This appeal under Section 13(1)(A) of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been filed against an
order dated 05.10.2021 passed by the Special Judge for
Trial and Disposal of Commercial Disputes, Ranga Reddy
District, at L.B.Nagar (hereinafter referred to as 'the
Commercial Court') in I.A.No.246 of 2021 in C.O.P.No.5 of ::2::
2021, by which application preferred by the appellant
under Order VII Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in
a petition filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred
to as 'the Act') has been rejected.
4. Learned Senior Counsel for the appellant
submits that the petition under Section 9 of the Act filed by
respondent No.1 is still pending. It is therefore submitted
that the appellant be granted the liberty to urge the
contention with regard to maintainability of the petition
under Section 9 of the Act while arguing the petition itself
and the appeal be disposed of with a direction to the
Commercial Court to decide the petition filed by
respondent No.1 expeditiously.
5. The aforesaid prayer has not been opposed by
learned counsel for respondent No.1.
6. In view of aforesaid submissions and in the
facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal is disposed
of with the direction to the Commercial Court to decide the ::3::
petition filed by respondent No.1 under Section 9 of the Act
expeditiously, preferably within a period of one (01) month
from today. Needless to state that it will be open for the
appellant to raise an objection with regard to
maintainability of the petition under Section 9 of the Act on
the ground of jurisdiction and the Commercial Court shall
decide the issue with regard to jurisdiction without the
influence of the observations contained in the order dated
05.10.2021. It is further made clear that this Court has
not expressed any opinion on merits of the claim of the
parties.
7. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall
stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ
_______________________________ J.SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 03.01.2025 Note:Issue C.C. today.
(B/o.) KL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!