Wednesday, 17, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vachana Ranjitha Chowdary vs The State Of Telangana,
2025 Latest Caselaw 1580 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1580 Tel
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2025

Telangana High Court

Vachana Ranjitha Chowdary vs The State Of Telangana, on 31 January, 2025

THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI

          CRIMINAL PETITION No.860 OF 2025

O R D E R:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of

the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (for short 'BNSS')

by petitioner/accused No.4 to quash the proceedings

against her in FIR.No.492 of 2024 before P.S.Godavari

Khani I Town, Ramagundam CP on the file of I Additional

Junior Civil Judge, Godhavari Khani, Peddapalli. The

offences alleged against petitioners are under Sections 85

r/w 3(5) of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') and Section 4

of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard Mr. Abhinav Mahender Reddy Kandadi,

learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. S.Madhavi,

learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent -

State. Perused the material on record.

3. Respondent No.2/de-facto complainant was married

to one Mr. V.Ajay Ram on 21.02.2019 and at the time of

marriage, certain gold, silver, household articles and

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

certain amount of cash was given as dowry as per the

complaint. Respondent No.2 was residing in Jagdevpur

along with her husband and in-laws and it is alleged that

she was harassed mentally and physically by demanding

additional dowry. It is also alleged that against her wish

her husband move to Italy, leaving her in India and that in-

laws and petitioner herein, residents of Bangalore, are

provoking her husband by phone for not fulfilling their

demand for additional dowry. It is further stated that

counseling was held by family members and elders, yet

there was no respite from the demands. Hence, FIR.

4. Initially, FIR/complaint was lodged on 06.07.2024 in

PS Karimnagar and vide memo dated 02.09.2024 the said

CD file in Crime No.46 of 2024 stood transferred to PS

Godhavari Khani I Town of Ramagundam Commissionerate

for further investigation.

5. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that

petitioner was resident of Bangalore for more than 10 years

and pursuing a job in Bangalore. It is submitted that

petitioner could have been indicted in the complaint as she

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

was pursuing her job in Bangalore and there is no way that

she could have mentally and physically harassed the

respondent No.2 and that allegations are omnibus

allegations against the petitioner and her parents. It is

further submitted that marriage of respondent No.2 with

V.Ajay Ram was commitment marriage and that in

commitment marriages, there is prohibition of dowry at the

time of marriage and that the allegations are false in

nature.

6. Learned counsel invited the attention of this Court to

Page No.26 wherein it is indicated that husband of de-facto

complaint stayed in India for a period of one week only and

left the country after the marriage and that allegations are

false in nature as the marriage was performed on

21.02.2019 and that there is no amount of truth and

allegations levelled by respondent No.2 with respect to

dowry harassment and physical harassment as stated in

the complaint are false.

7. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public

Prosecutor submitted that there are allegations of extra

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

dowry being demanded and petitioner along with her

parents harassed the de-facto complainant mentally and

physically and it is case where such facts have to be

elicited at the time of trial and no interference is

necessitated and on the basis of complaint, crime is

registered and it is at the investigation stage.

8. Perused the record, considered the submissions.

9. The marriage of de-facto complainant was performed

with one Mr. V.Ajay Ram on 21.02.2019 and her husband

left the country on 28.02.2019 as per the documents

annexed at Page No.26 along with criminal petition. On a

perusal of complaint/FIR annexed at Page No.22, it is

observed that there are no specific allegations against the

petitioner about the physical and mental harassment of de-

facto complainant. Husband of de-facto complainant left

the country, leaving her in India and that her in-laws and

petitioner herein have been instigating her husband for

additional dowry and that her husband harassing her

mentally and physically over phone. It is defies the logic of

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

this Court that how a person can harass physically by

phone as far as from Italy.

10. Be that as it may, it is not in dispute that petitioner

is a resident of Bangalore, pursuing her employment or job

at Bangalore. The Apex Court in a catena of judgments in

such nature of cases held that Courts before embarking

upon the issues have to take an overall perspective of the

case and then arrive at a conclusion. On a perusal of the

entire record before this Court, it is inferred that

allegations are all omnibus in nature and there is no

specific overt acts attributed by petitioner.

11. In cases of this nature, overall facts have to be looked

into. This Court, having perused the documents on record,

is of the opinion that appearance of petitioner/accused

No.4 before before P.S.Godavari Khani I Town,

Ramagundam CP on the file of I Additional Junior Civil

Judge, Godhavari Khani, Peddapalli, can be dispensed with

and is dispensed. It is made clear that if her presence is

required, she shall be present. It is made clear that counsel

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

on record for petitioner/accused No.4 shall be present at

every hearing of the case.

12. It is made clear that petitioner shall be present before

the Investigating Officer, if her presence is necessary for

the purpose of investigation. It is also made clear that if

she does not present herself before the Investigating

Officer, as required, this order shall stand vacated

automatically. Any observations made in this order shall

not influence the Court below while considering or

concluding the case at the time of trial.

13. With the above observations, this Criminal Petition is

disposed of.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

___________________________ ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J

Date: 31.01.2025 Note: Issue CC by 03.02.2025.

(B/o) plp

JAK, J CRLP_860_2025

THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI

CRIMINAL PETITION No.860 OF 2025

Date: 31.01.2025

Note: Issue CC by 03.02.2025.

(B/o) plp

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter