Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bollampally Veerareddy vs Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 2215 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2215 Tel
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2025

Telangana High Court

Bollampally Veerareddy vs Union Of India on 17 February, 2025

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

               WRIT PETITION No.4524 OF 2025

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

" ... pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in impounding the passports of the petitioners vide Passport No. X6034119 and X6035728 vide Surrender Certificates on the ground of pendency of the criminal case vide C. C. No. 495/2023 for the offence u/sec 498- A IPC r/w secs. 3 and 4 of D.P. Act as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently set aside the same and further direct the Respondent No.3 to return the passports No. X6034119 and X6035728 to the petitioners and pass......"

2. Heard Sri T.Chaitanya, learned counsel for the petitioners

and Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General

of India appearing for respondents.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the

writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.

4. After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

as well as the respondents, it appears that the issue was

considered by 2 Co-ordinate Benches in W.P.Nos.8697 of 2023

and 22218 of 2024. Both the learned Single Judges referred

the Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in Vangala Kasturi

Rangacharyulu v. Central Bureau of Investigation 1 and

came to the finding that mere pendency of criminal case cannot

be a ground to decline the renewal/reissue of passport provided

that the petitioner is ready for renewal/reissue of passport. In

this case, the petitioners are also ready to cooperate with the

Trial Court in concluding the trial and they are also willing to

cooperate with the pending proceedings. In Vangala Kasturi

Rangacharyulu (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that

the Passport Authority cannot refuse the release of passport on

the ground of pendency of criminal proceedings and accordingly

directed the Passport Authority to renew the passport of the

petitioner without raising objection relating to pendency of

criminal proceedings.

5. This Court is accordingly of the view that the Writ Petition

can be disposed of by directing the respondent No.3 to consider

the reply submitted by the petitioners and take steps for release

of the passport in due compliance of the findings of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu (supra).

The directions are as follows:

1 2020 Crl.L.J.(SC) 572

(i) The respondent No.3 shall release the petitioners' passports within two weeks from 22.02.2025. The respondent No.3 shall inform the petitioners of the time and place for the release of the passports.

ii) The petitioners shall submit an undertaking along with an affidavit before the learned I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Visakhapatnam in C.C.No.495 of 2023 stating that they will not leave India during pendency of the C.C. without permission of the Court and they will cooperate with the Trial Court in concluding the criminal proceedings.

(iii) The Trial Court shall issue a certified copy of the undertaking and affidavit within two weeks from the date of filing of the undertaking.

(iv) The petitioners shall submit the certified copy of the aforesaid undertaking along with the reply/explanation before the concerned Passport Officer for consideration of their application for release of passport.

(v) Respondent No.3 shall be at liberty of taking steps on breach of the undertaking.

v) The Passport Authority shall consider the documents in the light of the observations made by

the Courts as well as the undertaking and other documents filed by the petitioners. The petitioners shall also be at liberty to rely on the decisions in this regard. The petitioners shall be at liberty to file an application before the learned I Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Visakhapatnam seeking permission to travel outside India and the learned Magistrate shall consider the same in accordance with law.

6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed

of. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ

petition shall stand closed. There shall be order as to costs.

_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J

Date: 17.02.2025

Note: Issue CC in three days.

b/o pgp

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter