Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pingili Rama Devi vs The Union Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 2190 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2190 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2025

Telangana High Court

Pingili Rama Devi vs The Union Of India on 14 February, 2025

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
                WRIT PETITION No.4317 OF 2025

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

" ... to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the respondent No.2 in not renewing the passport of the petitioner bearing no.J2217795 pursuant to application of the petitioner dated 27/12/2024 to respondent no.2 online as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondents to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of 10 years in accordance with Rule 12 of Passport Rules 1980."

2. Heard Sri Mallareddy Gadipally, learned counsel for

the petitioner and Smt.N.V.R.Rajya Lakshmi, learned

counsel representing Sri G.Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy

Solicitor General of India, for respondents.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties,

the writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of

admission.

4. After hearing learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner as well as the respondents, it appears that the

issue was considered by 2 Co-ordinate Benches in

W.P.Nos.8697 of 2023 and 22218 of 2024. Both the learned

Single Judges referred the Hon'ble Supreme Court

Judgment in Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu v. Central

Bureau of Investigation 1 and came to the finding that

mere pendency of criminal case cannot be a ground to

decline the renewal/reissue of passport provided that the

petitioner is ready for renewal/reissue of passport. In this

case the petitioner is also ready to cooperate with the Trial

Court in concluding the trial and he is also willing to

cooperate with the pending proceedings. In Vangala

Kasturi Rangacharyulu (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme

Court held that the Passport Authority cannot refuse the

release of passport on the ground of pendency of criminal

proceedings and accordingly directed the Passport

Authority to renew the passport of the petitioner without

raising objection relating to pendency of criminal

proceedings.

5. This Court is accordingly of the view that the Writ

Petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent

No.2 to consider the explanation/reply submitted by the 1 2020 Crl.L.J.(SC) 572

petitioner dated 30.01.2025 and take steps for release of

the passport in due compliance of the findings of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vangala Kasturi

Rangacharyulu (supra). The directions are as follows:

(i) The respondent No.2 shall release the petitioner's

Passport within 2 weeks from 19.02.2025. The

respondent No.2 shall inform the petitioner of the time

and place for the release of Passport.

(ii) The petitioner shall submit an undertaking along

with an affidavit before the learned Judicial First

Class Magistrate at Jangaon in C.C.No.1229 of 2019

stating that the he will not leave India during

pendency of the C.C and crime without permission of

the Court and the he will cooperate with the Trial

Court in concluding the criminal proceedings.

(iii) The Trial Court shall issue a certified copy of the

undertaking and affidavit within 2 weeks from the

date of filing of the undertaking.

(iv) The petitioner shall submit the certified copy of

the aforesaid undertaking along with the reply/

explanation before the concerned Passport Officer for

consideration of his application for release of

passport.

(v) The respondent No.2 shall be at liberty of taking

steps on breach of the undertaking.

(vi) The Passport Authority shall consider the

documents in the light of the observations made by

the Courts as well as the undertaking and other

documents filed by the petitioner. The petitioner shall

also be at liberty to rely on the decisions in this

regard. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file an

application before the learned Judicial First Class

Magistrate at Jangaon seeking permission to travel

outside India and the learned Magistrate, shall

consider the same in accordance with law.

6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is

disposed of. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ

petition shall stand closed. There shall be order as to costs.

_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 14.02.2025 Note: Issue CC in two days b/o vsl

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter