Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Noor Uddin Abid vs The State Of Telangana
2025 Latest Caselaw 3570 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3570 Tel
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025

Telangana High Court

Mohd. Noor Uddin Abid vs The State Of Telangana on 18 August, 2025

Author: Nagesh Bheemapaka
Bench: Nagesh Bheemapaka
        HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

               WRIT PETITION No. 24282 OF 2025

     ORDER:

In this Writ Petition, a direction is sought to

Respondents - TGSPDCL to provide electricity connection to the

petitioner property bearing M.No.22-1-709, 22-1-715 and 22-1-

716, totally admeasuring 1333 square yards situated at

Noorkhan Bazar, Hyderabad without insisting on production of

'occupancy certificate' from Greater Hyderabad Municipal

Corporation.

2. Petitioner claims to be the absolute owner and

possessor of subject property. It is stated, they constructed stilt

+ three upper floors according to the approved sanctioned plan.

They have also paid all the requisite fee / charges /challans to

the respondents for electricity connection and the same was

also sanctioned on 17.07.2025. But respondents did not release

power supply on the ground that 'occupancy certificate' was not

submitted, which condition, according to petitioner, is not a

mandatory. Hence, the Writ Petition.

NBK,J WP_24282_2025

3. Heard Mr Mazher Ali Khan, learned counsel for

petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Energy for

respondent No.1 and Sri N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing

Counsel for TGSPDCL for respondent Nos.2 to 4. Perused the

record.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner contends that this Court

in several Writ Petitions directed respondents to release power

supply to the premises of petitioner therein subject to

compliance with the terms and conditions and on furnishing an

undertaking to produce the occupancy certificate from the

Municipal Corporation concerned within a prescribed period

and if no such occupancy certificate is produced within the

stipulated period, it is open to respondents to take appropriate

action in accordance with law. Hence, similar order may be

passed even in this Writ Petition also.

5. Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for

TGSPDCL submits that based on the above order, the

authorities have been releasing power supply, without insisting

on production of occupancy certificate and on the assurance

given by the parties that they would furnish the said certificate

at a later date, however, they are not turning up with the

NBK,J WP_24282_2025

certificates at all and enjoying the power supply. Hence,

learned Standing Counsel prays to take the said aspect into

consideration.

6. Evidently, TGSPDCL in their letter dated 17.07.2025

addressed to petitioner specifically mentioned that 'no service

connection shall be released for multi-storied buildings /

complexes greater than 10 meters in height unless occupancy

certificate from the authorities concerned is produced'. The

Corporation also granted building permit dated 19.03.2019

subject to the conditions that public amenities such as water

supply, electricity connections will be provided only on

production of occupancy certificate. Petitioner, however,

without questioning the said condition, cannot seek indulgence

of this Court now.

7. Though learned counsel for petitioner places strong

reliance on various orders, with great respect, this Court

inclines to take a slight departure, for, several buildings are

mushrooming after getting approval for a particular plan,

thereafter giving a go-by, additional floors are being raised

unscrupulously and the parties are applying for building

regularisation scheme for legalising the said unauthorised

NBK,J WP_24282_2025

structures and the civic body is not able to touch these

structures. This Court cannot be a mute spectator for such

unceremonious procedure and does not want to encourage this

type of activity in the interest of society at large.

8. The above-said opinion of this Court is justified by the

recent judgment in Rajendra Kumar Barjatya v. U.P. Avas

Evam Vikas Parishad 1 wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

the larger public interest, issued directions in addition to the

directives issued in Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of

structures. Relevant for the purpose of this case are:

(iv) All the necessary service connections, such as, Electricity,

water supply, sewerage connection, etc., shall be given by the

service provider / Board to the buildings only after the

production of the completion / occupation certificate.

(v) Even after issuance of completion certificate, deviation /

violation if any contrary to the planning permission brought to

the notice of the authority immediate steps be taken by the said

authority concerned, in accordance with law, against the builder

/ owner / occupant; and the official, who is responsible for

2024 SCC Online SC 3767

NBK,J WP_24282_2025

issuance of wrongful completion / occupation certificate shall

be proceeded departmentally forthwith.

(vi) No permission / licence to conduct any business / trade

must be given by any authorities including local bodies of States

/Union Territories in any unauthorised building irrespective of

it being residential or commercial building.

(vii) The development must be in conformity with the zonal plan

land usage. Any modification to such zonal plan and usage

must be taken by strictly following the rules in place land in

consideration of the larger public interest and the impact on the

environment.

9. In view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court making production of occupancy certificate / completion

certificate as condition precedent for releasing power supply and

also in view of the rampant misuse of the liberty granted by this

Court to the parties on several occasions, with regard to non-

insistence of Occupancy Certificate, this Court takes serious

note of the situation.

10. Therefore, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing

petitioner to approach the municipal authorities concerned first

NBK,J WP_24282_2025

for issuance of occupancy certificate. On producing such

certificate only, respondent - TGSPDCL shall consider the case

of petitioner for release of electricity connection, in accordance

with law. No costs.

11. Miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand closed.

-------------------------------------- NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J

Dated:18.08.2025

dgr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter