Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammed Abdul Rehman vs The Income Tax Officer
2025 Latest Caselaw 1644 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1644 Tel
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Telangana High Court

Mohammed Abdul Rehman vs The Income Tax Officer on 7 August, 2025

Author: P.Sam Koshy
Bench: P.Sam Koshy
     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
                     AND
           THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
            SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

                     W.P.No.23353 OF 2025

ORDER:

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Ms.Shaik Vaheeda Sushma, learned counsel for the

petitioner, Ms. Bokaro Sapna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel

for Income Tax Department appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3

and Mr. K.L.N.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel representing

Union of India for respondent No.4. Perused the record.

2. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order

dated 28.07.2025 in directing the petitioner to pay 20% of the

disputed demand, pending disposal of the appeal before the

Appellate Authority for the Assessment Year 2015-16.

3. The petitioner herein had filed statutory remedy of an

appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for

short, the 'Act') before the Appellate Authority. Along with the

Memo of Appeal, the petitioner had also preferred interim

protection so far as the recovery proceedings are concerned under

Section 220(6) of the Act. It is this application which stands

decided by the impugned order directing the petitioner for

payment of the amounts stated above.

4. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is

that the Assessment Order dated 28.07.2025 itself, in the light of

the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kankanala

Ravindra Reddy vs. Income Tax Officer 1, is not sustainable as

the notice under Section 148 was issued by the jurisdictional

Assessing Officer, whereas, as per the amended provision of the

Act, that ought to had been issued in the Faceless manner.

He further submits that the assessment of the petitioner themselves

carried out in a similar manner for the subsequent period was

already subjected to challenge before this Court for the Assessment

Year 2014-15 vide W.P.No.12348 of 2023 and the said writ

petition stood allowed vide order dated 07.11.2023. In the light of

the aforesaid two decisions, there is all likelihood of the appeal

pending before the Appellate Authority also having the same fate

of the Assessment Order not being maintainable and being set

aside.

(2023) 156 taxmann.com 178(TELANGANA)

5. In the light of the subsequent amendments brought in the

Act as also in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & ors., v. Ashish

Agarwal and others 2, the Assessing Authority ought to had

granted interim protection to the Assessee till finalization of the

appeal which the Assessing Authority has not considered.

6. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner so

far as the 148 notice issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer

not being in dispute by the learned Standing Counsel for the

Department and also in the light of the aforesaid judgments

rendered by this Court in the case of Kankanala Ravindra Reddy

(supra 1) and in the light of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in case of Ashish Agarwal (supra 2), we are of the

considered opinion that the Assessing Authority in the course of

deciding the petition under Section 220(6) of the Act, ought to

have taken a more pragmatic view and should had kept the

recovery proceedings in abeyance, pending the appeal before the

Appellate Authority.

2022 SCC OnLine SC 543

7. For the aforesaid reasons, we dispose of the present writ

petition at this juncture directing the Assessing Officer not to

pursue with the recovery proceedings in terms of the impugned

order dated 28.07.2025 till the appeal for the Assessment Year

2015-16 is finally decided.

8. Considering the fact that the appeal was filed in the year

2024, we expect that the Appellate Authority shall take up the

appeal and decide the same at the earliest, preferably, within a

period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications, pending if any,

shall stand closed.

__________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J

_________________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J 07.08.2025 Lrkm/Gnp

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter