Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vanga Harichandra Reddy, vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 4157 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4157 Tel
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024

Telangana High Court

Vanga Harichandra Reddy, vs The Greater Hyderabad Municipal ... on 22 October, 2024

Author: K.Lakshman

Bench: K.Lakshman

           HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

                                 (Special Original Jurisdiction)

                 MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER
                       TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN

                                         :PRESENT:
           THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
                                    WP :40485 of 2014
Between:
   1     Vanga Harichandra Reddy S/o. Late.V.Anantha Reddy.
   2     Vanga Venkat Reddy S/o.Late V. Anantha Reddy.
                                                                              ..... Petitioners
                                            AND
    1      The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner,
         Hyderabad.
    2      The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, L.B.Nagar Circle -III, Ranga Reddy District,
         Hyderabad.
    3      Smt. Vanga Hemalatha W/o. V. Surender Reddy, R/o.8-1-164, Karmanghat
         Village, Main Road, Hyderabad.
                                                                            .......Respondents
    Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances
stated in the Affidavit filed here in the High Court may be pleased to issue an order,
direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the
action of the Respondents proposing to demolish the premises bearing No. 8-1-28 of the
Petitioners herein in pursuance of the notice, dated 27-12-2014 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust,
and consequently, direct the officials respondents not to demolish the premises bearing
No.8-1-28 situated at Karmanghat Village, Saroor Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District;

    The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed
herein and upon hearing the arguments of SRI G.RAVI MOHAN, Advocate for the
Petitioner, and of Smt.A.Deepthi, learned Standing Counsel for GHMC, for the respondent
Nos. 1 & 2, and the Court made the following:

ORDER:

Learned Standing Counsel seeks time till 31.12.2014 to secure detailed instructions in the matter and so does the Counsel for the third respondent.

It is rather startling to know that, inspite of an order passed by this Court as long back as on 23.01.2013, respondents 1 & 2 have not acted strictly in accordance with law.

I have reason to believe that the second respondent has acted purposefully in the matter. Trying to act upon the order passed by this Court on 23.01.2013 in WPMP No.1556 of 2013 in W.P.No.1281 of 2013 a show cause notice was drawn under Subsection (2) of Section 452 on 14.02.2013. It was served on one Sri V.Ramakanth Reddy at H.No.8-1- 194/N. It was received on behalf of the petitioners by one Sri V.Surender Reddy on 04.03.2013. Till 27.12.2014 the Deputy Commissioner does not finalize the proceedings. He passes the order now under Section 636 of the Act on 27.12.2014, obviously because the contesting respondent herein has filed C.C.No.199 of 2014 in this Court and even now he communicates the order to the petitioners herein who are stated to be residents of H.No.8-1-28, Karmanghat Village, Obviously, this is how the Corporation seeks to help the offenders to get away from the offence committed by them.

No demolitions to be carried out pursuant to the impugned order dated 27.12.2014. Post the matter in motion list on 31.12.2014. Print the name of Ms.A.Deepthi, learned standing counsel for the Municipal Corporation.

The Deputy Commissioner of the Corporation should realize that he will be held personally accountable for the error committed, which is likely to be treated as not an error of judgment, but a deliberate one intending to help the offenders only.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To

1 The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. 2 The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, L.B.Nagar Circle -III, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad.

3 Smt. Vanga Hemalatha W/o. V. Surender Reddy, R/o.8-1-164, Karmanghat Village, Main Road, Hyderabad. (1 to 3 BY RPAD along with the copy of petition and affidavit) 4 One CC to SRI G.RAVI MOHAN, Advocate (OPUC). 5 One spare copy.

SRL

HIGH COURT

NRRJ

DATED: 29.12.2014 NOTE: POST THE MATTER IN MOTION LIST ON 31.12.2014.

ORDER

W.P.NO. 40485 OF 2014

DIRECTION

HIGH COURT Drafted by: SRL Date of Drafting : 31.12.2014

NRRJ

DATED: 29.12.2014 NOTE: POST THE MATTER IN MOTION LIST ON 31.12.2014.





                                             ORDER




                          W.P.NO. 40485     OF 2014




                                          DIRECTION
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter