Saturday, 11, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maqbool Azlapuram vs The State Of Telangana
2024 Latest Caselaw 4309 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4309 Tel
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Telangana High Court

Maqbool Azlapuram vs The State Of Telangana on 5 November, 2024

            HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY


                   WRIT PETITION No.18122 of 2024

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, is filed seeking the following relief:

"....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No 2 in issuing the Rejection Order vide application No.2400001655 dated 09.02.2024 and rejecting the online application of the petitioner without having any valid grounds, without assigning any reasons and he did not initiated to mutate the name of the petitioner and issue e- pattadar passbook on his cultivating land to an extent of Acs.3-13 gts in Sy.No.123/A which is situated at Bhairampalli Revenue Village, Maganoor Mandal, Narayanpet District is highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the online application of the petitioner for mutate the name of the petitioner and issue epattadar passbook on his cultivating land to an extent of Acs.3-13 gts in Sy.No.123/A which is situated at Bhairampalli Revenue Village, Maganoor Mandal, Narayanpet District...."

2. Considered the submissions of Sri Rapolu Bhaskar, learned

counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government

Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

3. The petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of land

admeasuring Acs.3-13 guntas in Sy.No.123/A situated at

Bhairampalli Revenue Village, Maganoor Mandal, Narayanpet

District, which has been purchased by his father through registered

sale deed vide document No.491 of 2000 dated 26.06.2000 from its

original owners. It is the further case of the petitioner that he

submitted an online application vide No. 2400001655 dated

09.02.2024 for issuance of new e-pattadar passbooks and for

mutation of his name in all the revenue records in respect of the

said property, as per the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land

and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020 (for short 'Act, 2020), but the

said application has been rejected by the respondents without

assigning any reasons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Section 6

the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020

(for short 'Act, 2020'), confers power on the Tahsildar to update the

Record of Rights when rights over land are acquired through

succession, survivorship, or inheritance. Legal heirs or family

members must reach a consensus on how to divide the land and

submit a joint agreement online. The Tahsildar, after assigning a

convenient date and time, will verify the documents and collect

mutation charges. Upon verification, the Tahsildar will instantly

update the records and issue either a new or updated Pattadar Pass

Book-cum-Title Deed, along with an extract of the changes. The

heirs are also required to furnish family details for inclusion in the

updated title deeds and Section 7 of the Act, 2020 empowers the

Tahsildar to update the Record of Rights when ownership is

acquired through a court decree. The person holding the decree

must apply online for an appointment. On the scheduled date, the

Tahsildar will verify if the decree aligns with the existing records. If

relevant fees are paid, the Tahsildar will immediately update the

records, transferring the land from the judgment debtor to the

decree holder. A new or updated Pattadar Pass Book-cum-Title

Deed will be issued, and the judgment debtor will be directed to

produce their title deed for necessary changes.

5. In view of the said submissions and since it is stated that the

respondents have rejected the application of the petitioner stating

that the petitioner has not enclosed any documents in support of

the application for mutating his name in the revenue records, this

Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met, if the

petitioner is directed to submit a fresh application by duly enclosing

all the documents, which are required for mutating his name in the

revenue records and for issuance of e-pattadar passbooks in respect

of the subject lands. In the event of filing such application, the

respondents are directed to examine the same after issuing notices

to all the interested parties and pass reasoned order in accordance

with law and communicate the decision thereon to the petitioner,

within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of

this order.

6. With the above observations this writ petition is disposed of.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,

shall stand closed.

_________________________ C.V.BHASKAR REDDY, J Date: 05.11.2024 sus

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter