Saturday, 11, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vedula Kalidas vs The State Of Telangana
2024 Latest Caselaw 4308 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4308 Tel
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Telangana High Court

Vedula Kalidas vs The State Of Telangana on 5 November, 2024

      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

               WRIT PETITION No.29349 OF 2024
ORDER:

With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is

disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief:

"...to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus and to declare the action of the respondents are not concluding the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner though the petitioner was submitted his explanation on 04.04.2023 to the charges issued by the 3rd respondent on 22.12.2022 and till date except appointing the Enquiry Officer on 27.03.2023 even after lapse of 1 ½ year, it is clearly in violation of the settled law by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Judgment of Ajay Kumar Choudhary v Union of India (2015) 7 SCC 291, as well as G.O.Ms.No.679, GA (Ser-c) Dept., dt. 01.11.2008, the said action of the respondents is highly illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, discriminatory and also in violation of Art 14, 16 and 21 of constitution of India and declaring the same in bad in law and consequently direct the respondents to conclude the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner though the petitioner was submitted his explanation on 04.04.2023 to the charges issued by the 3rd respondent on 22.12.2022 and till date except appointing the Enquiry Officer on 27.03.2023 even after lapse of 1 ½ year and by following the Hon'ble Apex Court in Judgment of Ajay Kumar Choudhary v Union of India (2015) 7 SCC 291 and as well as in G.O. Ms.No.679, GA (Ser-c) Dept dt.01.11.2008..."

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner,

learned Government Pleader for Services-I, appearing for

respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Smt. P.K.Kalyani, learned

Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

submits that while the petitioner was working as

Auditor/Superintendent in respondent No.2 - school,

respondent No.3 issued charge memo vide

Rc.No.0791/B2/2022, dated 22.12.2022 against him, for

which he has submitted explanation on 04.04.2023

denying the charges. Learned counsel further submits

that without considering the said explanation, though an

Enquiry Officer was appointed on 27.03.2023, so far the

enquiry is not yet concluded. He further submits that in

terms of G.O.Ms.No.679, General Administration (Services-

C) Department, dated 01.11.2008, in case of minor

charges, the enquiry shall be completed within a period of

three (3) months and in case of major charges, the enquiry

shall be completed within a period of six (6) months. In

the present case though 1 ½ year elapsed, till date the

respondents have not choosen to conclude the disciplinary

proceedings initiated against the petitioner and hence, he

prayed this Court to issue a direction to the respondents to

conclude the enquiry within a stipulated time.

5. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions,

submits that the petitioner has submitted his defence

statement on 04.04.2023 i.e., after four months from the

date of issuance of charge memo. Since the explanation

submitted by the petitioner is not satisfied, an Enquiry

Officer was appointed on 27.03.2024. He further submits

that despite repeated reminders, the petitioner failed to

appear before the Enquiry Officer, the enquiry could not be

completed in time.

6. Having regard to the submissions made by

learned counsel for respective parties, this Court is of the

considered opinion that it is appropriate to direct

respondent No.3 to conclude the disciplinary proceedings

pending against the petitioner. It is made clear that the

petitioner shall cooperate with the Enquiry Officer in

conclusion of the enquiry. The aforesaid exercise shall be

completed, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a

period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

7. With the direction, the Writ Petition is disposed

of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this Writ

Petition shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK Date: 05.11.2024 Note:

Issue C.C by 08.11.2024 (B/o) YVL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter