Saturday, 11, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mamidi Nagaiah vs V. Ramshetty Goud, Major
2024 Latest Caselaw 4285 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 4285 Tel
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024

Telangana High Court

Mamidi Nagaiah vs V. Ramshetty Goud, Major on 4 November, 2024

      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

                M.A.C.M.A.No.1019 of 2009

JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the award dated 19.11.2008 in

O.P.No.761 of 2005 passed by the Chairman, Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional District Judge,

Nalgonda, the appellant has filed this appeal for

enhancement of the compensation amount.

2. Heard Smt K.Rajitha, learned counsel for the

appellant and Sri G.Purushotham Rao, learned counsel

appearing for respondent No.2 and perused the entire

material on record.

3. Brief facts of the case:

3.1 On 18.05.2005, when the appellant reached the

outskirts of Thalla Vellemla Village in a scooter bearing No.AP

24 E 288, one Tata Sumo bearing No.KA 29 N 2345 came in a

rash and negligent manner at high speed and gave dash to the

appellant from opposite direction, due to which the appellant

sustained grievous injuries.

4. Submissions of learned counsel for the appellant:

4.1. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that as per

Ex.A5 i.e., disability certificate issued by the District Medical

Board, Nalgonda, the appellant sustained disability of 40%.

However, the tribunal has taken only 20% disability in the

absence of any evidence on record. Learned counsel further

contended that the appellant has produced the medical

bills under Ex.A6 and claimed an amount of Rs.29,099/-

towards medical expenses. However, the tribunal has

awarded an amount of Rs.5,000/- towards pain and

suffering and Rs.15,000/- towards medical expenses, which

is meager amount. Learned counsel further contended that

the appellant claimed an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-,

whereas, the tribunal has awarded an amount of

Rs.84,800/- and the appellant is entitled for enhancement

of remaining amount of Rs.15,200/- as claimed by him.

5. Submissions of learned counsel for respondent No.2:

5.1. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for

respondent No.2 contended that the tribunal after

considering the oral and documentary evidence on record

has rightly awarded an amount of Rs.84,800/- and the

appellant is not entitled for enhancement of compensation.

6. Analysis of the case:

6.1. Having considered the rival submissions made by

the respective parties and after perusal of the material

available on record, it reveals that the tribunal after

considering the evidence on record held that due to rash

and negligent driving of the driver of Tata Sumo bearing

No.KA 29 N 2345, the accident has taken place and the

appellant sustained grievous injuries. The appellant has

filed Ex.A5 i.e., disability certificate issued by the Medical

Board, wherein it is mentioned that the appellant sustained

40% disability due to fracture of shaft right femur and also

filed Ex.A6 i.e., medical bills, hospital expenses and

transportation charges.

6.2. Considering the nature of injuries, the tribunal

awarded an amount of Rs.5,000/- towards pain and

suffering and Rs.15,000/- towards medicines, hospital

expenses, transportation charges and extra nourishment,

which appears to be meager. Hence, this Court is of the

considered view that the appellant is entitled for an amount

of Rs.5,000/- towards pain and suffering and Rs.10,000/-

towards medical bills, hospital expenses, transportation

charges and extra nourishment in addition to the amount

awarded by the tribunal. Accordingly, the appellant is

granted total compensation amount of Rs.99,800/-

(Rs.84,800+15,000).

7. In the result, the M.A.C.M.A is partly allowed,

enhancing the compensation amount awarded by the

tribunal from Rs.84,800/- to Rs.99,800/-/-(Rupees Ninety

Nine Thousand Eight Hundred only). The compensation

amount shall be deposited within a period of three (03)

months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

The enhanced amount shall carry interest at 7.5% p.a. from

the date of petition till the date of realization. On such

deposit, appellant is entitled to withdraw the entire amount

without furnishing the security.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

closed. No order as to costs.

_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J

Date: 04.11.2024 vsl

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter