Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1352 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2024
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A. Nos.3282 AND 3306 OF 2012
COMMON JUDGMENT:
Both the appeals are preferred by the appellant-National
Insurance Company Limited aggrieved by the judgment and
decree dated 17.05.2007 passed in O.P.Nos.1704 and 1705 of
2001 respectively by the I Additional Motor Accidents Claims
Tribunal, Nizamabad (for short 'the Tribunal').
2. In both the appeals, the ground raised by the learned
counsel appearing for the Insurance Company is that the policy
has lapsed as the cheque given for renewal of policy has
bounced.
3. The Tribunal found that the bouncing of the cheque was
not intimated to the owner of the vehicle and unless the said
proof of intimation is provided, the insurer cannot disown its
liability.
4. In view of the Division Bench judgment of the High Court
of Andhra Pradesh in United India Insurance Company
Limited v. K. Anjaiah and others 1, I do not find any infirmity
with the finding of the Tribunal on both the grounds regarding
triple riding and also non-intimation of bouncing of cheque
issued towards renewal of the policy. As seen from the
impugned order, though there was a discussion regarding
contributory negligence, however, the quantum granted by the
Tribunal needs no interference and therefore, both the appeals
are liable to be dismissed.
5. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
No costs.
_______________________ JUSTICE K.SURENDER Date: 28.03.2024 NDS
2004 (1) L.S. 332
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A. Nos.3282 AND 3306 OF 2012
Date: 28.03.2024 NDS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!