Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Abdul Gafoor vs M/S.Piyush Rajul Construction ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 1287 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1287 Tel
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2024

Telangana High Court

Mohd. Abdul Gafoor vs M/S.Piyush Rajul Construction ... on 22 March, 2024

     HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

            CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1490 of 2022

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition, under Section 115 of C.P.C., is

filed against the order dated 30.06.2022 passed by the Principal

District Judge, Karimnagar, in E.P.No.119 of 2020 in O.S.No.38 of

2017.

2. The petitioner herein is the judgment debtor/defendant and

the respondents are the decree holders/plaintiffs.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present Civil

Revision Petition are that the respondents filed the suit vide

O.S.No.38 of 2017 on the file of the Principal District Judge at

Karimnagar, for recovery of money of Rs.85,84,000/- against the

petitioner. In view of the compromise arrived at between the

parties, the matter was referred to the Lok Adalat Bench at

Karimnagar, which in turn, passed an Award on 23.01.2018. As per

the terms of compromise, the petitioner has to withdraw the cases

filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, pending

before the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class,

Karimnagar, and has to return back four post-dated cheques issued

LNA, J

to him by the respondents. It was further agreed that the petitioner

shall refund the earnest money of Rs.52,00,000/- , which was given

to him by the respondents under agreement of sale dated 15.09.2016

on condition of completion of sale of quarry land, within one year

from the date of compromise.

4. The respondents filed the E.P. stating that out of

Rs.52,00,000/-, which was directed to be refunded by the petitioner

to the respondents towards earnest amount, only a sum of

Rs.8,00,000/- was paid and the balance amount of Rs.44,00,000/-

was not paid.

5. The petitioner filed counter in the said E.P. denying the claim

of the respondents and stating that he paid Rs.44,00,000/- within

one year from the date of the Award and the balance of

Rs.8,00,000/- was paid by way of RTGS on 21.10.2019. It is stated

that the respondents have returned the post dated cheque bearing

No.616800 on the same day and the said cheque was encashed by

him on 21.02.2020 for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- for his personal needs.

6. The Executing Court, after hearing both sides vide the

impugned order dated 30.06.2022 ordered for attachment of the E.P.

LNA, J

Schedule immovable property and adjourned the matter to

28.07.2022. Hence, the present Civil Revision Petition.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Court

below failed to appreciate the fact that the cheque, which was issued

by the petitioner at the time of passing of Award dated 23.01.2018,

was returned back to the respondents. He further contended that

the balance amount was already paid to the respondents.

8. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits

that the Court below has considered all the aspects and has rightly

passed the impugned order and prayed to dismiss the Civil

Revision Petition.

9. A perusal of the record discloses that except making assertion

that he has paid the entire amount, the petitioner failed to place on

record any material in proof of payment of Rs.52,00,000/-, which

was agreed to be refunded by the petitioner to the respondents

under the Lok Adalat Award dated 23.01.2018. Further, though the

petitioner claimed that he paid Rs.44,00,000/- to the respondents on

various dates within one year from the date of the Award, he failed

LNA, J

to give the details, dates of payment and also the mode of payment

i.e., whether it was in cash or in any other mode.

10. In the light of the above and the material available on record,

this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned order is

well reasoned and the petitioner failed to make out any case to

interfere with the same. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition fails

and liable to be dismissed with costs.

11. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. The

petitioner shall pay costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only)

to the Telangana State Legal Services Authority, High Court

premises, at Hyderabad, within a period of four weeks.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________________ LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY, J Date: 22.03.2024 va

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter