Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Saraswathi , Saraswathamma, ... vs V. Anjaneyulu, Rr Dist And Ano
2024 Latest Caselaw 1081 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1081 Tel
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2024

Telangana High Court

Smt. Saraswathi , Saraswathamma, ... vs V. Anjaneyulu, Rr Dist And Ano on 13 March, 2024

          THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

                   M.A.C.M.A. No.1173 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:

The appellant who is mother of the deceased filed this

appeal being not satisfied with the compensation granted by the

I Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar,

Hyderabad(for short, the Tribunal) order dated 22.02.2013,

passed in O.P.No.485 of 2009.

2. Appellant claimed compensation of Rs.9,00,000/- on

account of death of her son. According to her case, while the

deceased was going on motorcycle along with pillion rider from

Madinaguda towards Kukatpally, one Tractor bearing No.AP-37-

AB-6966 came in a rash and negligent manner and hit the

motorcycle at high speed, resulting in the instantaneous death of

appellant's son.

3. The manner in which the accident had taken place and other

aspects are not disputed by either of the parties.

4. However, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

income of the deceased had to be considered at Rs.6,000/- per

month, but the Tribunal had considered only Rs.5,000/-, though

salary certificate was filed. Further, he submits that the

appropriate multiplier would be '18', keeping in view the age of

the deceased, but the Tribunal had considered the multiplier '11'

taking into consideration the age of the mother.

5. Considering Ex.A6, which is a salary certificate issued by

PW-3/employer, the income of the deceased can be considered at

Rs.6,000/- per month. Future prospects can be considered at

40% and since the deceased was bachelor, 50% income has to be

considered.

6. In so far as the deduction towards personal and living

expenses is concerned, the deceased was bachelor. As per the

decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sarla Verma and others

vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and another 1, the standard

deduction towards personal and living expenses of the deceased

should who is a bachelor should be 50%.

(2009) 6 SCC 121

7. In National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay

Sethi and others 2, the Hon'ble Apex Court at paragraph 59.4

held that in case the deceased was employed or on a fixed salary,

an additional 40% of income should be awarded towards future

prospects, where the deceased age was below 40 years. Since

the age of deceased at the time of the accident was 25 years,

40% of monthly income of the deceased can be taken towards

future prospects.

8. With regard to the multiplier, as per the decision of Hon'ble

Supreme Court in Sarla Verma (supra), the multiplier is '18' for

the age groups of 21 to 25. The age of the deceased as on the

date of the accident was 25 years.

9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court very recently in the case of

Anjali and others vs Lokendra Rathod and others 3, decided

on 06.12.2022, taking into consideration the decision of Sarala

Verma (supra) and also the case of Pranay Sethi (supra) has

awarded a sum of Rs.44,000/- towards loss of consortium. The

(2017) 16 SCC 680

2023(1) ALD 107(SC)

said enhancement and revision at 10% every 3 years has been

done taking into consideration, raise in the cost of expenses and

cost of living that has arisen during the intervening period from

the date of decisions of Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi.

10. In view of the above discussion, the compensation amount

is calculated as under:

Sl.No.                Head                         Compensation awarded

1        Income                              Rs.72,000/- per annum (Rs.6,000/-
                                             per month)

2        Future prospects                    Rs.28,800/- (40% of income)

3        Total income                        Rs.1,00,800/-

2        Deduction towards personal          Rs.50,400/-     (i.e.,    50%    of   total
         expenses                            income )

3        Net Income                          Rs.50,400/-     (i.e.,   Rs.1,00,800/-   (-)
                                             Rs.50,400/-)



5        Loss of dependency                  Rs.9,07,200/- (i.e., Rs.1,00,800/- x
                                             18)

6        Consortium (Rs.44,000/- x1)         Rs.    44,000/-

7        Funeral expenses                    Rs.    15,000/-

8        Loss of estate                      Rs.    15,000/-

         Total compensation    to   be       Rs.9,81,200/-
         paid:




11. In the result, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous

Appeal is allowed, enhancing the compensation amount awarded

by the Tribunal from Rs.4,65,000/- to Rs.9,81,200/-. The

enhanced amount shall be deposited by the respondent Nos. 1

and 2 jointly and severally within a period of two (2) months

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The enhanced

compensation amount shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum

from the date of claim petition till realization. On such deposit,

claimant is permitted to withdraw the amount without

furnishing any security. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

No costs.

______________ K.SURENDER Date: 13.03.2024 ktm/da

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter