Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri S.Srinivas Rao S/O Sri S.Surya ... vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh
2024 Latest Caselaw 2790 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2790 Tel
Judgement Date : 23 July, 2024

Telangana High Court

Sri S.Srinivas Rao S/O Sri S.Surya ... vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh on 23 July, 2024

        THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

                         WRIT PETITION No.11653 of 2013


ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant

Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the

respondents. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of.

2. This writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer:

"to direct directing the Respondent No.4 to register the Sale Deed dated 10.04.2006, pertaining to property in Plot bearing No.100, admeasuring 266 Sq yards in Survey No.74/3 in M/S Ravi Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Mahindra Hills, Marredpally Secunderabad Cantonment Secunderabad executed in Petitioners favor by one Smt Kirni Bai after declaring the refusal endorsement No.57/07 dated 19/09/2007 of the Respondent No.4 as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and release the said document to the Petitioner."

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one Smt.Kirni Bai was

the absolute owner of Plot No.100, admeasuring 266 Sq.Yards, in Survey

No.74/3, in M/s.Ravi Co-operative Housing Society Limited (Mahendra Hills),

Marredpally, Secunderabad Cantonment, thereafter Smt.Kirni Bai executed

sale deed dated 10.04.2006 in respect of subject property in favour of

petitioner. Subsequently, petitioner approach Registering Authority to

register the subject property, however, the Registering Authority has

refused to register the subject document. Aggrieved by the same, this writ

petition is filed.

4. Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned

counsel for the petitioner submits that this Court granted interim order on

17.04.2013, which reads hereunder:

"In the light of the interim direction granted by this Court in similar matters, there shall be a direction to respondents 3 and 4 to received and register the documents presented by the petitioner in respect of Plot No.100 in Survey No.74/3 of East Maredpally, Secunderabad Cantonment in the event the document fulfils the requirements of law, without reference to the claim of the Government that it is Government land. The registration shall however be subject to the result of this writ petition."

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the

interim order passed by this Court on 17.04.2013, the respondent authorities

have registered the subject property and further submits that in view of

interim order passed by this Court no further orders are required to be

passed in this Writ petition.

6. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration

would submit that counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent

No.2 i.e., District Collector, Hyderabad, and the Paragraph No.8 reads as:

"It is submitted that a comprehensive land case was filed by the then Mandal Revenue Officer, Marredpally against the (7) Societies and as well as some of individual plot owners of Sy.No.74 of Marredpally (Paigah) village in L.G.C, No.167/97 in the Spl.Court under L.G(P) Act, 1982. The Hon'ble Spl.Court, under A.P.L.G.(P) Act dismissed the LGC No.167/97 on 18-03-2010. Aggrieved by the same, the then MRO, Marredpally Mandal filed

WP No.19106/2010, before the Hon'ble High Court and the same is pending. The Hon'ble Spl.Court dismissed the LGC on erroneous grounds without properly appreciating the evidence of Govt. and as such writ petition has been filed challenging the same. Thus the LGC judgment has not become final. Further submitted that the litigation between the parties and the Govt. has not reached to its logical end. Under such circumstances it can't be said that Govt. have lost its claim. As such the interest of Govt. still subsists. In view of the above the interest of Govt. that subsists in the subject land will be jeopardized if this W.P. is allowed. Hence it is liable for dismissal."

7. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that subject

matter was earlier adjudicated by the Spl.Court under A.P.L.G.(P) Act,

1982, vide LGC No.167 of 1997, however the said LGC No.167 of 1997 has

been dismissed on 18.03.2010. Aggrieved the same, the Mandal Revenue

Officer, Marredpally Mandal, filed WP No.19106 of 2010 before this Court

and the Hon'ble Division Bench has heard and reserved for orders.

8. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that

many parties have filed writ petitions on the similar issue and obtained

interim order and thereafter the respondent authorities have received,

registered and released the documents therein, however fairly submits that

in most of the cases, the respondent authorities have not filed counter-

affidavit and the counter-affidavit filed in this writ petition may be adopted

in all these similar pending writ petitions, as the issue involved in all the

pending writ petitions is one and the same and pray this Court to dispose of

all the pending writ petitions, granting liberty to all the concerned parties

to seek appropriate remedy, subject to the outcome of the order which

would be pass in WP No.19106 of 2010.

9. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side

and in view of the fact that the subject document is registered in pursuant

to the interim order, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ

petition granting liberty to both the parties to seek appropriate remedy, in

accordance with law, subject to the outcome of the order which would be

pass in WP No.19106 of 2010, if so otherwise aggrieved.

10. It is made clear that mere registration of the document does not

confer title on the subject property and it is also made clear that this order

would not have any bearing on all those matters where title/rights of the

parties are pending before the authorities either in revision/appeals for

adjudication and in any other case this order also does not preclude the

parties in asserting their rights before a competent Court of law.

11. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous

applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

______________________________ N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR,J 23.07.2024 SHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter