Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Somavar Pandari vs Smt. Rajeshwari
2024 Latest Caselaw 176 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 176 Tel
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024

Telangana High Court

Sri Somavar Pandari vs Smt. Rajeshwari on 9 January, 2024

Author: K. Lakshman

Bench: K.Lakshman, P.Sree Sudha

        HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
                      AND
       HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA

       FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.199 of 2023


JUDGMENT:

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)

In compliance with the order dated 07.11.2023,

learned counsel for the appellant has filed a proof of

service vide USR No.490 of 2024, dated 02.01.2024.

Despite service of notice, there is no representation

on behalf of the respondent.

2. Challenging the order dated 01.05.2023 in

I.A.No.593 of 2021 in F.C.A.No.11 of 2020 passed by

the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-III Additional

District and Sessions Court at Nizamabad, appellant

herein has preferred the present appeal.

3. Appellant/Respondent has filed a petition under

Section 13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1955 vide F.C.O.P.No.11 of 2020 against

F.C.A.No.199 of 2023

respondent/wife seeking dissolution of marriage on

the grounds of cruelty as well as desertion.

4. Vide order dated 01.05.2023 learned Family

Court allowed the said F.C.O.P.No.11 of 2020 and

dissolved the marriage of appellant with respondent

only on the ground of desertion. Learned Family

Court gave a specific finding that appellant herein

failed to prove cruelty.

5. During the pendency of the said F.C.O.P.No.11

of 2020, respondent/wife had filed an Interlocutory

Application vide I.A.No.593 of 2021 in F.C.A.No.11 of

2020 seeking an amount of Rs.10,000/- towards

legal expenses and Rs.20,000/- per month towards

maintenance. Vide order dated 01.05.2023, learned

Family Court allowed the said application in part and

granted an amount of Rs.3,000/- per month to the

respondent/wife towards maintenance and an

amount of Rs.10,000/- towards legal expenses.

6. Sri N.Gangadhar, learned counsel for the

appellant, on instructions, would submit that the

impugned order and decree dated 01.05.2023 is only

an interlocutory order. As per Section 19(1) of the

Family Courts Act, the appellant herein has to file a

revision. Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, is

extracted below:

(1) Save as provided in sub-section (2) and notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law, an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law. -(1) Save as provided in sub-section (2) and notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) or in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) or in any other law, an appeal shall lie from every judgment or order, not being an interlocutory order, of a Family Court to the High Court both on facts and on law."

7. It is relevant to note that the appellant herein

has already filed a revision under Article 227 of

Constitution of India vide C.R.P.No.2207 of 2023.

8. According to Sri N.Gangadhar, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellant, a learned Judge

of this Court raised an objection with regard to the

maintainability of the said revision under Article 227

of Constitution of India. Therefore, he sought

permission to withdraw the said C.R.P.No.2207 of

2023. Accordingly, the said C.R.P.No.2207 of 2023 is

dismissed as withdrawn.

9. As discussed Supra, the impugned order dated

01.05.2023 in I.A.No.593 of 2021 in F.C.A.No.11 of

2020 passed by the learned Judge Family Court-

cum-III Additional District & Sessions Court at

Nizamabad is only an interlocutory order, therefore,

appeal is not maintainable.

10. We are of the considered view that against the

said order, revision is maintainable under Article 227

of Constitution of India.

11. In the light of the same, this Family Court

Appeal is dismissed granting liberty to the appellant

to file a fresh revision challenging the aforesaid

impugned order, dated 01.05.2023. There shall be

no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any,

pending in the Family Court Appeal shall stand

closed.

____________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J

____________________ P. SREE SUDHA, J January 09, 2024 DSV/PN

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA

FAMILY COURT APPEAL No.199 of 2023 (per Hon'ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)

January 09, 2024 DSV/PN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter