Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

United India General Insurance Co. ... vs Khaja Raziuddin And 2 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 717 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 717 Tel
Judgement Date : 20 February, 2024

Telangana High Court

United India General Insurance Co. ... vs Khaja Raziuddin And 2 Others on 20 February, 2024

          THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

                 M.A.C.M.A No.1791 OF 2013

JUDGMENT:

1. The appellant-Insurance Company filed this appeal against

the Order and Decree dated 12.04.2013 in O.P.No.251 of 2011 on

the file of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal (III

Additional District Judge) at Nalgonda, where under the Tribunal

granted an amount of Rs.2,90,000/- towards compensation along

with interest @ 7.5% per annum as against the claim of

Rs.6,00,000/- on account of the injuries sustained by the

claimant in the motor vehicle accident occurred on 18.10.2010.

2. The manner of accident and the injuries sustained by the

claimant are not in dispute. However, the appellant-Insurance

Company challenged the impugned award on the ground that the

deceased was a gratuitous passenger and not entitled for

compensation.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-Insurance

Company and the learned counsel for the respondents.

4. The case of the Insurance Company is that the deceased

was travelling in a Qualis vehicle which belongs to respondent

No.1, owner of the vehicle, to Hyderabad. When the vehicle

reached Kothaguda bridge, the driver of the vehicle drove in a rash

and negligent manner and dashed against the bridge resulting in

the vehicle falling into the bridge and some of inmates received

injuries and also one died for which the claim was made.

5. The Tribunal considering the judgment of erstwhile Andhra

Pradesh High Court in United India Insurance Company Ltd.,

vs. Ahmadi Begum and others 1, observed that if a private vehicle

is allowed to carry persons other than its owner or driver, as per

the conditions of registration, all such persons come within

expression as third party, since the policy covers third party.

6. Learned counsel appearing for Insurance Company had not

come up with any other decision of the Apex Court to show that

the view taken by this Court in the above judgment is incorrect.

The deceased cannot be considered as gratuitous passenger as

argued by the Insurance Company counsel.

7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Surekha, W/o Rajendra

Nakhate and Ors vs. Santosh, S/o Namdeo Jadhav and

others 2 held that if the High Court comes to a conclusion that the

Tribunal ought to have granted more compensation than that was

granted, without any cross appeal, the said award can be passed

over and above the award of the Tribunal. The claim of the

LC ACR 2011 (8) AP (1)

Law Finder Doc.Id.1732663

claimants is that the deceased was earning Rs.5,000/-p.m.,

however, the Tribunal had taken the income as Rs.3,000/-p.m.

The multiplier '18' has to be taken since the deceased was aged 23

years, however, the Tribunal has taken '15' as multiplier. In

accordance with the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in

Smt.Sarla Varma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation 3, the

appropriate multiplier is '18'. Further, as per the ratio laid down

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Vs. Pranay Sethi 4, claimants are entitled for 40% on the income

of the deceased towards future prospects.

8. Accordingly, the compensation is enhanced under various

heads as follows:

                                       Awarded by            Awarded by
    Sl.No.        Name of Head          Tribunal             this Court
       01.    Loss of contribution         2,70,000/-        Rs.3,24,000/-
                                        (15 multiplier)     (18 multiplier)
      02.     Love and affection        Rs.15,000/-          Rs.15,000/-
      03.     Funeral expenses          Rs.5,000/-            Rs.5,000/-
      04.     40% future                     /-              Rs.1,29,600/-
              prospects
                                     Rs.2,90,000/-        Rs.4,73,000/-
      TOTAL


9. In the result, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

is partly allowed enhancing the compensation awarded by the

Tribunal from Rs.2,90,000/- to Rs.4,73,000/-. The enhanced

2009(6) SCC 121

2017(6) ALD 170 (SC)

amount shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of

petition till the date of realization. Except the above enhancement,

the award of the Tribunal shall remain same on all other aspects.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date : 20.02.2024 dv

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

M.A.C.M.A No.1791 OF 2013 Dt.20.02.2024

dv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter