Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 606 Tel
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2024
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A. No.2009 OF 2007
JUDGMENT:
1. Appellants-claimants who are the wife and children of the
deceased filed this appeal against the Order and Decree dated
03.04.2007 in O.P.No.340 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal-Cum-I Additional District Judge, Mahboobnagar,
where under the Tribunal granted an amount of Rs.6,80,00/-
towards compensation along with interest @ 7.5% per annum as
against the claim of Rs.15,00,000/- on account of the death of the
deceased in the motor vehicle accident occurred on 18.02.2005.
2. The manner of accident and the death of the deceased on the
spot who is the husband and father of the appellants herein is not
disputed and the appellants challenged the impugned award only on
the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal. Therefore,
this Court is not inclined to go into other details other than the
quantum of compensation.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned
counsel for the 2nd respondent-Insurance Company.
4. The deceased was working as Police constable at the time of
his death and was aged about 36 years. He was drawing gross
salary of Rs.7,114/-. The death occurred on account of accident on
18.02.2005 while he was attending his duties at check post near
Raikal along with his colleague. The deceased was passing urine by
the left side of the road, a lorry from Jadcherla with a load of iron
rods came in a rash and negligent manner with a high speed and
ran over the deceased resulting in his death.
5. The Tribunal at paragraph No.18 of the judgment reduced 25%
of the compensation granted on the ground of contributory
negligence. In the evidence of the witnesses and discussion of the
Tribunal, it is not mentioned that the petitioner was standing on the
road when the accident had taken place. At para No.14, the
Tribunal assumed that the deceased was not standing on the edge of
the road and was standing 2 feet inside the road, since the dead
body was found on the road and lorry driver would have suddenly
spotted the deceased and failed to save the deceased for the reason
of not being at a safer distance. The said findings were made
without proof and on the basis of assumption contrary to facts and
circumstances of the accident. It is the case of the witnesses that
the deceased was not standing on the road and there are no logical
conclusions by the Tribunal to state that the deceased was standing
2 feet inside the road.
6. In the said circumstances, the findings of the Tribunal
regarding contributory negligence and reduction of 25% of the
compensation is hereby set aside. As such, the appellants are
entitled for total compensation of Rs.9,18,132/- instead of
Rs.6,80,00/- without reducing 25% towards contributory negligence.
7. Accordingly, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is
partly allowed. The difference amount of Rs.2,38,132/-shall carry
interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of
realization. Except the above enhancement, the award of the
Tribunal shall remain same on all other aspects. There shall be no
costs.
8. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No
costs.
__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date : 13.02.2024 dv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!